PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYLB vs. GIUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYLB vs. GIUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) and Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYLB achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than GIUSX's 0.34% return.


HYLB

1D
0.11%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.09%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
4.06%
10Y*

GIUSX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.56%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
4.87%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
2.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYLB vs. GIUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.65%8.74%8.14%12.03%-10.80%3.94%5.04%14.06%-1.80%6.00%
GIUSX
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class
0.34%7.86%2.91%7.07%-16.63%-0.90%14.63%4.47%1.20%6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between HYLB and GIUSX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2016

0.27

Over the past year, HYLB and GIUSX have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYLB vs. GIUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLB
HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GIUSX
GIUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GIUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GIUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYLB vs. GIUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) and Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYLBGIUSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

1.95

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.90

5.95

+6.95

HYLB vs. GIUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYLB Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the GIUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYLB and GIUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYLBGIUSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.43

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.02

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.70

-0.12

Drawdowns

HYLB vs. GIUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLB drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, roughly equal to the maximum GIUSX drawdown of -22.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLB and GIUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYLBGIUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-22.02%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.27%

-2.99%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.51%

-6.10%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.54%

-22.02%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-1.87%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-4.09%

+1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

0.97%

-0.44%

Volatility

HYLB vs. GIUSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) is 1.19%, while Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that HYLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYLBGIUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

1.46%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

2.97%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

4.07%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.47%

5.91%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.18%

4.83%

+3.35%

HYLB vs. GIUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GIUSX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYLB vs. GIUSX - Dividend Comparison

HYLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than GIUSX's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIUSX
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class
4.80%4.75%4.68%4.39%2.71%3.36%4.36%2.42%2.76%3.47%3.85%4.96%
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.48%6.29%6.31%5.84%5.53%4.45%5.22%5.71%5.95%5.85%0.27%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYLB and GIUSX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIUSX has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to HYLB (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYLB dropped -22.91% vs GIUSX's -22.02%.

HYLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYLB and GIUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer