GIUSX vs. FIKQX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX).
GIUSX is managed by Guggenheim. FIKQX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
GIUSX vs. FIKQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GIUSX vs. FIKQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIUSX Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class | -0.71% | 7.86% | 2.91% | 7.07% | -16.63% | -0.90% | 14.63% | 4.47% | 1.39% |
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | -0.34% | 7.31% | 1.69% | 6.75% | -13.97% | -1.03% | 10.00% | 9.90% | 2.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIUSX achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than FIKQX's -0.34% return.
GIUSX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
FIKQX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GIUSX vs. FIKQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIUSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKQX's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GIUSX vs. FIKQX — Risk / Return Rank
GIUSX
FIKQX
GIUSX vs. FIKQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIUSX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.03 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.48 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.79 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 5.21 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIUSX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.03 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.08 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.49 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between GIUSX and FIKQX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GIUSX vs. FIKQX - Dividend Comparison
GIUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than FIKQX's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIUSX Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class | 4.40% | 4.75% | 4.68% | 4.39% | 2.71% | 3.36% | 4.36% | 2.42% | 2.76% | 3.47% | 3.85% | 4.96% |
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | 3.66% | 3.97% | 4.08% | 3.65% | 2.05% | 1.44% | 4.90% | 2.83% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GIUSX vs. FIKQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIUSX drawdown since its inception was -22.02%, which is greater than FIKQX's maximum drawdown of -18.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIUSX and FIKQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIUSX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.02% | -18.53% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -2.83% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.02% | -18.53% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -2.29% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -5.30% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.97% | +0.02% |
Volatility
GIUSX vs. FIKQX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) at 1.53%. This indicates that GIUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GIUSX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.64% | 1.53% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | 2.59% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45% | 4.40% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 5.98% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.80% | 5.51% | -0.71% |