HYKE vs. AMAX
HYKE (Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF) and AMAX (RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. HYKE charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for AMAX.
Performance
HYKE vs. AMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HYKE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMAX
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 2.71%
- 1Y
- 11.23%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYKE vs. AMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HYKE Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 0.00% |
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF | 5.37% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYKE vs. AMAX — Risk / Return Rank
HYKE
AMAX
HYKE vs. AMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (HYKE) and RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYKE | AMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.36 | — |
Drawdowns
HYKE vs. AMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYKE drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum AMAX drawdown of -16.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYKE and AMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYKE | AMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -16.28% | +16.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.79% | +2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -5.32% | +5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.54% | — |
Volatility
HYKE vs. AMAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYKE | AMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 9.97% | -9.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 10.37% | -10.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 10.37% | -10.37% |
HYKE vs. AMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYKE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYKE vs. AMAX - Dividend Comparison
HYKE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF | 11.05% | 9.18% | 7.36% | 6.99% | 11.22% | 1.00% |
HYKE Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HYKE is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYKE is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AMAX.
AMAX has the higher dividend yield at 11.05%, compared with 0.00% for HYKE.
They also come from different issuers: Cboe Vest and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HYKE and 1.29% for AMAX.
Find the right allocation for HYKE and AMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer