PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYHG vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYHG vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYHG achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -44.43% return. Over the past 10 years, HYHG has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 6.12%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.90% annualized return.


HYHG

1D
0.12%
1M
0.64%
YTD
3.03%
6M
3.57%
1Y
7.52%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
6.12%

SQQQ

1D
1.53%
1M
-22.29%
YTD
-44.43%
6M
-42.11%
1Y
-64.38%
3Y*
-55.94%
5Y*
-49.01%
10Y*
-55.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYHG vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYHG
ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged
3.03%5.31%11.41%14.69%-1.71%5.75%0.16%12.02%-1.95%3.76%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-44.43%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between HYHG and SQQQ is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2013

-0.47

The correlation between HYHG and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.52 (5 years) to -0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYHG vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYHG
SQQQ

Communication Services

1.1%

-

Healthcare

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

97.1%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

HYHG
1.1%
SQQQ

-

Healthcare

HYHG
0.6%
SQQQ

-

Basic Materials

HYHG

-

SQQQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

HYHG

-

SQQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

HYHG

-

SQQQ

-

Energy

HYHG

-

SQQQ

-

Financial Services

HYHG

-

SQQQ
97.1%

Industrials

HYHG

-

SQQQ

-

Real Estate

HYHG

-

SQQQ

-

Technology

HYHG

-

SQQQ

-

Utilities

HYHG

-

SQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYHG vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYHG
HYHG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HYHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HYHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYHG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYHG vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYHGSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.73

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

-0.98

+4.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.28

-1.79

+14.08

HYHG vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYHG and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYHGSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

-1.35

+2.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

-0.74

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

-0.85

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

-0.88

+1.34

Drawdowns

HYHG vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYHG drawdown since its inception was -25.71%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYHG and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYHGSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.71%

-100.00%

+74.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-65.95%

+63.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.47%

-92.38%

+84.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.21%

-97.23%

+88.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.71%

-99.98%

+74.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-100.00%

+99.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-92.40%

+89.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

35.96%

-35.35%

Volatility

HYHG vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) is 1.42%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 13.81%. This indicates that HYHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYHGSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

13.81%

-12.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.30%

36.46%

-32.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

47.79%

-42.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.16%

66.61%

-58.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.15%

66.10%

-56.95%

HYHG vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYHG vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

HYHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%, less than SQQQ's 12.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYHG
ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged
6.78%6.97%6.57%6.07%5.58%4.54%5.21%6.06%6.45%5.57%5.37%6.37%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
12.29%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYHG and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQQQ has higher volatility (13.81%) compared to HYHG (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYHG dropped -25.71% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, HYHG leads with 6.12% vs -55.90% for SQQQ. On fees, HYHG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HYHG has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 6.12% return vs -55.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYHG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.29%, compared with 6.78% for HYHG.

HYHG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYHG and 0.95% for SQQQ.

HYHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYHG and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer