PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGW vs. HYEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGW vs. HYEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGW achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than HYEM's 3.81% return.


HYGW

1D
0.20%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.47%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
10Y*

HYEM

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.91%
YTD
3.81%
6M
4.19%
1Y
10.08%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
4.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGW vs. HYEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYGW
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
1.89%6.19%6.99%7.31%-0.12%
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
3.81%9.24%12.14%8.35%5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGW and HYEM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022

0.46

HYGW vs. HYEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYGW
HYEM

Utilities

99.6%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

100.0%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

HYGW
99.6%
HYEM

-

Real Estate

HYGW
0.4%
HYEM

-

Basic Materials

HYGW

-

HYEM

-

Communication Services

HYGW

-

HYEM

-

Consumer Cyclical

HYGW

-

HYEM

-

Consumer Defensive

HYGW

-

HYEM

-

Energy

HYGW

-

HYEM

-

Financial Services

HYGW

-

HYEM

-

Healthcare

HYGW

-

HYEM

-

Industrials

HYGW

-

HYEM
100.0%

Technology

HYGW

-

HYEM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGW vs. HYEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYGW
HYGW Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HYGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGW Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

HYEM
HYEM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HYEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGW vs. HYEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYGWHYEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.46

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

3.71

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.88

15.14

+1.74

HYGW vs. HYEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGW Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the HYEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGW and HYEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYGWHYEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.33

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.54

+0.72

Drawdowns

HYGW vs. HYEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGW drawdown since its inception was -5.49%, smaller than the maximum HYEM drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGW and HYEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGWHYEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-30.96%

+25.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.82%

-2.73%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.66%

-5.23%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-4.40%

+3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.67%

-0.27%

Volatility

HYGW vs. HYEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) is 0.88%, while VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that HYGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGWHYEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

1.32%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

3.21%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81%

4.33%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.68%

7.49%

-2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

9.27%

-4.59%

HYGW vs. HYEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGW has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than HYEM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGW vs. HYEM - Dividend Comparison

HYGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, more than HYEM's 6.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.53%6.67%6.34%6.27%6.47%5.33%5.56%6.14%5.71%5.86%6.25%7.64%
HYGW
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
11.54%12.53%12.30%15.98%8.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGW and HYEM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYEM has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to HYGW (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGW dropped -5.49% vs HYEM's -30.96%.

On 3-year performance, HYEM leads with 10.82% vs 5.74% for HYGW. On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HYGW has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HYEM has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for HYGW.

HYGW has the higher dividend yield at 11.54%, compared with 6.53% for HYEM.

HYGW tracks Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index, while HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for HYGW and 0.40% for HYEM.

HYGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGW and HYEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer