PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGW vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGW vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGW achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return.


HYGW

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.69%
6M
2.54%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
10Y*

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGW vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYGW
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
1.69%6.19%6.99%7.31%-0.12%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.13%22.41%17.45%22.27%-3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGW and ACWI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022

0.63

The correlation between HYGW and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYGW vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYGW
ACWI

Utilities

99.6%
2.6%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Communication Services

-

9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.0%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

16.1%

Healthcare

-

8.1%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Technology

-

29.4%

Utilities

HYGW
99.6%
ACWI
2.6%

Real Estate

HYGW
0.4%
ACWI
1.8%

Basic Materials

HYGW

-

ACWI
3.7%

Communication Services

HYGW

-

ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HYGW

-

ACWI
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

HYGW

-

ACWI
5.0%

Energy

HYGW

-

ACWI
4.2%

Financial Services

HYGW

-

ACWI
16.1%

Healthcare

HYGW

-

ACWI
8.1%

Industrials

HYGW

-

ACWI
10.9%

Technology

HYGW

-

ACWI
29.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGW vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYGW
HYGW Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HYGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGW Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGW vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYGWACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.41

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.01

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.70

13.53

+3.18

HYGW vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGW Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGW and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYGWACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.29

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.43

+0.82

Drawdowns

HYGW vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGW drawdown since its inception was -5.49%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGW and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGWACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-56.00%

+50.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.82%

-9.73%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.66%

-16.55%

+12.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.83%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-8.61%

+8.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

2.16%

-1.76%

Volatility

HYGW vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) is 0.88%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that HYGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGWACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

3.93%

-3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

10.29%

-8.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81%

12.78%

-9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.68%

16.05%

-11.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

17.11%

-12.43%

HYGW vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGW has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGW vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

HYGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.56%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
HYGW
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
11.56%12.53%12.30%15.98%8.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGW and ACWI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to HYGW (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGW dropped -5.49% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 3-year performance, ACWI leads with 21.15% vs 5.64% for HYGW. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, HYGW has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for HYGW.

HYGW has the higher dividend yield at 11.56%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

HYGW is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ACWI is Global Equities. HYGW tracks Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for HYGW and 0.32% for ACWI.

HYGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGW and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer