HYGW vs. ACWI
HYGW (iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYGW is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYGW returned 5.64%/yr vs 21.15%/yr for ACWI. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYGW charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
HYGW vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYGW achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return.
HYGW
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 6.60%
- 3Y*
- 5.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
HYGW vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 1.69% | 6.19% | 6.99% | 7.31% | -0.12% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.13% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYGW and ACWI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022 | 0.63 |
The correlation between HYGW and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYGW vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYGW
ACWI
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
HYGW
ACWI
Real Estate
HYGW
ACWI
Basic Materials
HYGW
-
ACWI
Communication Services
HYGW
-
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
HYGW
-
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
HYGW
-
ACWI
Energy
HYGW
-
ACWI
Financial Services
HYGW
-
ACWI
Healthcare
HYGW
-
ACWI
Industrials
HYGW
-
ACWI
Technology
HYGW
-
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYGW vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
HYGW
ACWI
HYGW vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYGW | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.41 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 3.01 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.70 | 13.53 | +3.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYGW | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 2.29 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.43 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
HYGW vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYGW drawdown since its inception was -5.49%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGW and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYGW | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -56.00% | +50.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | -9.73% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.66% | -16.55% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.83% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -8.61% | +8.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 2.16% | -1.76% |
Volatility
HYGW vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) is 0.88%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that HYGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYGW | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 3.93% | -3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.21% | 10.29% | -8.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81% | 12.78% | -9.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.68% | 16.05% | -11.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.68% | 17.11% | -12.43% |
HYGW vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYGW has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYGW vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
HYGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.56%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 11.56% | 12.53% | 12.30% | 15.98% | 8.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYGW and ACWI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to HYGW (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGW dropped -5.49% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 3-year performance, ACWI leads with 21.15% vs 5.64% for HYGW. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, HYGW has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for HYGW.
HYGW has the higher dividend yield at 11.56%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.
HYGW is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ACWI is Global Equities. HYGW tracks Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for HYGW and 0.32% for ACWI.
HYGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYGW and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer