PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGV vs. QLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGV vs. QLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored Bond Index Fund (HYGV) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGV achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than QLV's 9.55% return.


HYGV

1D
0.28%
1M
0.07%
6M
1.48%
YTD
2.25%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.02%

QLV

1D
0.50%
1M
1.91%
6M
6.89%
YTD
9.55%
1Y
16.70%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.97M$4.09M$4.06M
$571.44K$481.55K$516.78K

HYGV vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored Bond Index Fund
2.25%7.92%8.02%12.11%-12.60%5.93%8.01%4.03%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
9.55%12.28%18.08%13.71%-9.97%26.08%9.63%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGV and QLV is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.67

The correlation between HYGV and QLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGV vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HYGV
HYGV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HYGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HYGV vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored Bond Index Fund (HYGV) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGVQLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.71

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

11.17

-1.90

HYGV vs. QLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the QLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGV and QLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYGV vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGV drawdown since its inception was -23.47%, smaller than the maximum QLV drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGV and QLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGVQLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.47%

-33.71%

+10.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-6.19%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.56%

-12.05%

+6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.12%

-17.93%

+0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-3.93%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

1.50%

-0.88%

Volatility

HYGV vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored Bond Index Fund (HYGV) is 0.81%, while FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that HYGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGVQLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

2.30%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

5.98%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

7.88%

-4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.59%

12.64%

-5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.11%

16.43%

-7.32%

HYGV vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGV has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGV vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison

HYGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, more than QLV's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored Bond Index Fund
7.44%7.48%8.20%8.77%7.64%6.07%6.18%7.95%5.63%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.52%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGV and QLV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLV has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to HYGV (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGV dropped -23.47% vs QLV's -33.71%.

On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 10.05% vs 3.49% for HYGV. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, HYGV has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 10.05% return vs 3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for HYGV.

HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.44%, compared with 1.52% for QLV.

HYGV is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while QLV is Quality Factor. HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for HYGV and 0.22% for QLV.

QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGV and QLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer