PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGH vs. GSST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGH vs. GSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGH achieves a 3.24% return, which is significantly higher than GSST's 1.66% return.


HYGH

1D
0.17%
1M
0.74%
YTD
3.24%
6M
3.69%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
6.50%

GSST

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.89%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGH vs. GSST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
3.24%6.94%11.22%12.17%-0.92%5.82%0.54%2.80%
GSST
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF
1.66%5.20%6.01%6.08%0.13%0.05%1.74%2.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGH and GSST is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019

-0.05

The correlation between HYGH and GSST shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGH vs. GSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYGH
HYGH Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HYGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGH Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

GSST
GSST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGH vs. GSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGHGSSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-13.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

3.93

-2.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.88

29.85

-24.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.08

184.69

-165.61

HYGH vs. GSST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGH Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is lower than the GSST Sharpe Ratio of 7.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGH and GSST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYGH vs. GSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGH drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, which is greater than GSST's maximum drawdown of -3.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGH and GSST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGHGSSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.88%

-3.51%

-20.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-0.15%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.06%

-0.25%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.24%

-1.19%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-0.16%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.02%

+0.39%

Volatility

HYGH vs. GSST - Volatility Comparison

iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) has a higher volatility of 0.68% compared to Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) at 0.13%. This indicates that HYGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGHGSSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.13%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

0.41%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

0.58%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.07%

0.63%

+6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.34%

0.86%

+7.48%

HYGH vs. GSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGH has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than GSST's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGH vs. GSST - Dividend Comparison

HYGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than GSST's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSST
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF
4.31%4.56%5.45%4.98%1.97%0.71%1.12%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
6.60%6.86%7.85%8.95%6.21%3.74%4.06%4.89%6.45%4.79%4.60%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGH and GSST have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYGH has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to GSST (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGH dropped -23.88% vs GSST's -3.51%.

On 5-year performance, HYGH leads with 7.00% vs 3.77% for GSST. On fees, GSST is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, GSST has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYGH has performed better with a 7.00% return vs 3.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSST is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for HYGH.

HYGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 4.31% for GSST.

HYGH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while GSST is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for HYGH and 0.16% for GSST.

GSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.94 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGH and GSST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer