HYEM vs. RIGS
HYEM (VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF) and RIGS (RiverFront Strategic Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYEM is passively managed, while RIGS is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYEM returned 4.63%/yr vs 3.30%/yr for RIGS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYEM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for RIGS.
Performance
HYEM vs. RIGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYEM achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly higher than RIGS's 1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, HYEM has outperformed RIGS with an annualized return of 4.63%, while RIGS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.30% annualized return.
HYEM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- 8.96%
- 3Y*
- 10.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- 4.63%
RIGS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.60%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
HYEM vs. RIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 3.97% | 9.24% | 12.14% | 8.35% | -13.39% | -1.31% | 6.87% | 12.85% | -3.38% | 7.94% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 1.37% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYEM and RIGS is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2013 | 0.28 |
The correlation between HYEM and RIGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYEM vs. RIGS — Risk / Return Rank
HYEM
RIGS
HYEM vs. RIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYEM | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.08 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 0.79 | +2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.39 | 1.84 | +11.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYEM vs. RIGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYEM drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than RIGS's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEM and RIGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYEM | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -15.31% | -15.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -4.55% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.23% | -5.18% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | -9.03% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.96% | -15.31% | -15.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -1.09% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -1.60% | -2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 1.95% | -1.28% |
Volatility
HYEM vs. RIGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) is 1.14%, while RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that HYEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYEM | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 3.77% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.26% | 5.88% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 9.92% | -5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 7.67% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.27% | 7.81% | +1.46% |
HYEM vs. RIGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYEM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RIGS's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYEM vs. RIGS - Dividend Comparison
HYEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than RIGS's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 6.52% | 6.67% | 6.34% | 6.27% | 6.47% | 5.33% | 5.56% | 6.14% | 5.71% | 5.86% | 6.25% | 7.64% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.83% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYEM and RIGS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIGS has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to HYEM (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYEM dropped -30.96% vs RIGS's -15.31%.
On 10-year performance, HYEM leads with 4.63% vs 3.30% for RIGS. On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HYEM has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HYEM has performed better with a 4.63% return vs 3.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for RIGS.
HYEM has the higher dividend yield at 6.52%, compared with 4.83% for RIGS.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYEM and 0.48% for RIGS.
HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYEM and RIGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer