PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYEM vs. IBHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYEM vs. IBHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYEM achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly higher than IBHH's 1.85% return.


HYEM

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.26%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.29%
1Y
9.50%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
4.64%

IBHH

1D
0.02%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.85%
6M
2.22%
1Y
5.85%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYEM vs. IBHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
4.28%9.24%12.14%8.35%-1.21%
IBHH
iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.85%8.02%7.53%12.87%-6.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HYEM and IBHH is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2022

0.54

The correlation between HYEM and IBHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYEM vs. IBHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYEM
HYEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HYEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IBHH
IBHH Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IBHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHH Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYEM vs. IBHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYEMIBHHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

4.80

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.23

19.19

-4.96

HYEM vs. IBHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the IBHH Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYEM and IBHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYEM vs. IBHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYEM drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than IBHH's maximum drawdown of -12.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEM and IBHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYEMIBHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-12.05%

-18.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-1.22%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.23%

-4.66%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.06%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-2.27%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.31%

+0.36%

Volatility

HYEM vs. IBHH - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) at 0.69%. This indicates that HYEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYEMIBHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

0.69%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.25%

2.11%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

2.79%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.51%

7.22%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.27%

7.22%

+2.05%

HYEM vs. IBHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYEM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYEM vs. IBHH - Dividend Comparison

HYEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, more than IBHH's 6.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.50%6.67%6.34%6.27%6.47%5.33%5.56%6.14%5.71%5.86%6.25%7.64%
IBHH
iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.25%6.39%6.93%6.65%5.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYEM and IBHH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYEM has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to IBHH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYEM dropped -30.96% vs IBHH's -12.05%.

On 3-year performance, HYEM leads with 10.35% vs 8.78% for IBHH. On fees, IBHH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HYEM has performed better with a 10.35% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYEM.

HYEM has the higher dividend yield at 6.50%, compared with 6.25% for IBHH.

HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while IBHH tracks Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYEM and 0.35% for IBHH.

HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYEM and IBHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer