PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYEM vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYEM vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYEM achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than EDIV's 4.31% return. Over the past 10 years, HYEM has underperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 4.61%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 8.98% annualized return.


HYEM

1D
0.05%
1M
0.21%
YTD
3.71%
6M
4.40%
1Y
9.80%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
4.61%

EDIV

1D
-0.17%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
4.31%
6M
6.35%
1Y
11.64%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYEM vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
3.71%9.24%12.14%8.35%-13.39%-1.31%6.87%12.85%-3.38%7.94%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.31%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HYEM and EDIV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2012

0.37

HYEM vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYEM
EDIV

Industrials

100.0%
9.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

12.8%

Energy

-

3.2%

Financial Services

-

29.7%

Healthcare

-

1.3%

Real Estate

-

5.1%

Technology

-

8.4%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Industrials

HYEM
100.0%
EDIV
9.7%

Basic Materials

HYEM

-

EDIV
1.7%

Communication Services

HYEM

-

EDIV
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HYEM

-

EDIV
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

HYEM

-

EDIV
12.8%

Energy

HYEM

-

EDIV
3.2%

Financial Services

HYEM

-

EDIV
29.7%

Healthcare

HYEM

-

EDIV
1.3%

Real Estate

HYEM

-

EDIV
5.1%

Technology

HYEM

-

EDIV
8.4%

Utilities

HYEM

-

EDIV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYEM vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYEM
HYEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HYEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYEM vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYEMEDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.18

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

1.13

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.72

3.45

+11.27

HYEM vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYEM and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYEMEDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

0.94

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.74

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.52

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.16

+0.38

Drawdowns

HYEM vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYEM drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEM and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYEMEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-53.36%

+22.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-10.36%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.23%

-13.84%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

-28.32%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

-40.76%

+9.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-5.97%

+5.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-19.35%

+14.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

3.39%

-2.72%

Volatility

HYEM vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) is 1.16%, while SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that HYEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYEMEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

4.14%

-2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

10.31%

-7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.33%

12.42%

-8.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.49%

13.86%

-6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.27%

17.50%

-8.23%

HYEM vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYEM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYEM vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

HYEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than EDIV's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.59%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.53%6.67%6.34%6.27%6.47%5.33%5.56%6.14%5.71%5.86%6.25%7.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYEM and EDIV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to HYEM (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYEM dropped -30.96% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 10-year performance, EDIV leads with 8.98% vs 4.61% for HYEM. On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HYEM has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 8.98% return vs 4.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

HYEM has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 4.59% for EDIV.

HYEM is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while EDIV is Emerging Markets Equities. HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYEM and 0.49% for EDIV.

HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYEM and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer