HYDW vs. IBHH
HYDW (Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF) and IBHH (iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYDW tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index while IBHH tracks the Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYDW returned 7.32%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for IBHH. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HYDW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHH.
Performance
HYDW vs. IBHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYDW achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than IBHH's 1.92% return.
HYDW
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- —
IBHH
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 6.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYDW vs. IBHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 1.25% | 8.47% | 5.42% | 9.84% | -3.94% |
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.92% | 8.02% | 7.53% | 12.87% | -6.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDW and IBHH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2022 | 0.86 |
The correlation between HYDW and IBHH shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYDW vs. IBHH — Risk / Return Rank
HYDW
IBHH
HYDW vs. IBHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYDW | IBHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 5.26 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.38 | 21.04 | -8.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYDW vs. IBHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYDW drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than IBHH's maximum drawdown of -12.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDW and IBHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDW | IBHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -12.05% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.09% | -1.22% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.64% | -4.66% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -2.28% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 0.31% | +0.13% |
Volatility
HYDW vs. IBHH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) is 0.67%, while iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) has a volatility of 0.72%. This indicates that HYDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYDW | IBHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 0.72% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.30% | 2.11% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95% | 2.82% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.41% | 7.22% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.97% | 7.22% | -0.25% |
HYDW vs. IBHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYDW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBHH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYDW vs. IBHH - Dividend Comparison
HYDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, less than IBHH's 6.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 5.73% | 5.75% | 5.35% | 5.69% | 4.78% | 3.30% | 4.45% | 4.56% | 4.42% |
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.25% | 6.39% | 6.93% | 6.65% | 5.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYDW and IBHH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBHH has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to HYDW (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDW dropped -17.75% vs IBHH's -12.05%.
On 3-year performance, IBHH leads with 8.44% vs 7.32% for HYDW. On fees, HYDW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IBHH has performed better with a 8.44% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYDW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHH.
IBHH has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 5.73% for HYDW.
HYDW tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index, while IBHH tracks Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HYDW and 0.35% for IBHH.
IBHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYDW and IBHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer