HYDW vs. ASHX
HYDW (Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF) and ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYDW is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index, while ASHX is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYDW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ASHX.
Performance
HYDW vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HYDW
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 5.53%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- —
ASHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYDW vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 1.04% | 8.47% | 5.42% | 9.84% | -7.86% | 2.77% | 5.51% | 11.44% | -1.08% |
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | -13.59% | -26.45% | 2.64% | 42.24% | 35.03% | -30.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDW and ASHX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018 | 0.27 |
The correlation between HYDW and ASHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYDW vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank
HYDW
ASHX
HYDW vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYDW | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYDW | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | — | — |
Drawdowns
HYDW vs. ASHX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDW | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | — | — |
Volatility
HYDW vs. ASHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYDW | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.40% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.99% | — | — |
HYDW vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYDW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYDW vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison
HYDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, while ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.48% | 19.46% | 2.91% |
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 5.75% | 5.75% | 5.35% | 5.69% | 4.78% | 3.30% | 4.45% | 4.56% | 4.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYDW and ASHX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYDW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYDW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASHX.
HYDW has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.00% for ASHX.
HYDW is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ASHX is China Equities. HYDW tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index, while ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HYDW and 0.60% for ASHX.
Find the right allocation for HYDW and ASHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer