PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYDW vs. ASHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYDW vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HYDW

1D
0.15%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.44%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
6.99%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*

ASHX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYDW vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYDW
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
1.04%8.47%5.42%9.84%-7.86%2.77%5.51%11.44%-1.08%
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.27%-13.59%-26.45%2.64%42.24%35.03%-30.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HYDW and ASHX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018

0.27

The correlation between HYDW and ASHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYDW vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYDW
HYDW Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HYDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ASHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYDW vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYDWASHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

HYDW vs. ASHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYDWASHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

Drawdowns

HYDW vs. ASHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYDWASHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

Volatility

HYDW vs. ASHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYDWASHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.99%

HYDW vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYDW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYDW vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison

HYDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, while ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.38%1.76%0.84%0.80%1.78%1.07%2.48%19.46%2.91%
HYDW
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
5.75%5.75%5.35%5.69%4.78%3.30%4.45%4.56%4.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYDW and ASHX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYDW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYDW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASHX.

HYDW has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.00% for ASHX.

HYDW is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ASHX is China Equities. HYDW tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index, while ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HYDW and 0.60% for ASHX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYDW and ASHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer