HYDR vs. NLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR).
HYDR and NLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HYDR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Hydrogen Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007. Both HYDR and NLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HYDR vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HYDR vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDR Global X Hydrogen ETF | 14.75% | 43.73% | -33.08% | -36.49% | -47.24% | -13.89% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 8.18% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 6.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYDR achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's 8.18% return.
HYDR
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -5.99%
- YTD
- 14.75%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 117.67%
- 3Y*
- -11.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -12.66%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 85.99%
- 3Y*
- 37.72%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HYDR vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYDR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HYDR vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
HYDR
NLR
HYDR vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYDR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 2.05 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 2.62 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 3.41 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.89 | 8.20 | +1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYDR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.05 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 0.18 | -0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDR and NLR is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HYDR vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
HYDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than NLR's 2.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDR Global X Hydrogen ETF | 3.33% | 3.82% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 2.36% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Drawdowns
HYDR vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYDR drawdown since its inception was -89.28%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDR and NLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.28% | -65.05% | -24.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.76% | -25.80% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.65% | -18.26% | -55.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.40% | -35.90% | -28.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.42% | 10.73% | +1.69% |
Volatility
HYDR vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) has a higher volatility of 13.62% compared to VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) at 12.53%. This indicates that HYDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HYDR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.62% | 12.53% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.08% | 32.94% | +5.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.41% | 42.20% | +7.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.23% | 28.16% | +18.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.23% | 23.38% | +22.85% |