HYD vs. GDX
HYD (VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYD is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Custom High Yield Composite Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYD returned 2.00%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for GDX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
HYD vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYD achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, HYD has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 2.00%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.
HYD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 2.99%
- 1Y
- 8.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- -0.10%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
GDX
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 61.27%
- 3Y*
- 41.00%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
HYD vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYD VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF | 2.11% | 2.83% | 4.94% | 6.52% | -15.97% | 5.05% | 0.17% | 9.34% | 2.19% | 9.78% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -0.90% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYD and GDX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2009 | 0.15 |
The correlation between HYD and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYD vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
HYD
GDX
HYD vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (HYD) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYD | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.25 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.00 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.87 | 5.13 | +3.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYD | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.35 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.52 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.38 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.13 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
HYD vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYD drawdown since its inception was -35.61%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYD and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYD | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.61% | -80.34% | +44.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -30.84% | +27.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.23% | -30.84% | +23.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.72% | -46.51% | +25.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | -49.79% | +14.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -26.62% | +24.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -40.43% | +36.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 11.99% | -11.06% |
Volatility
HYD vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (HYD) is 1.14%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that HYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYD | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 15.40% | -14.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.99% | 37.50% | -34.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 45.49% | -41.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.45% | 36.39% | -29.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.60% | 37.18% | -24.58% |
HYD vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYD vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
HYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
HYD VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF | 4.26% | 4.29% | 4.29% | 4.13% | 3.96% | 3.50% | 4.01% | 4.08% | 4.43% | 4.29% | 4.58% | 4.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYD and GDX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to HYD (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYD dropped -35.61% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs 2.00% for HYD. On fees, HYD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 2.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
HYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.
HYD is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while GDX is Gold. HYD tracks Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Custom High Yield Composite Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYD and 0.51% for GDX.
HYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYD and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer