PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYBX vs. PWRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYBX vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYBX achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than PWRD's 20.36% return.


HYBX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.34%
YTD
2.89%
6M
2.53%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PWRD

1D
-4.25%
1M
2.16%
YTD
20.36%
6M
18.41%
1Y
30.69%
3Y*
31.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYBX vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HYBX
TCW High Yield Bond ETF
2.89%6.26%-0.04%
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
20.36%32.84%-3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HYBX and PWRD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYBX vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYBX
HYBX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HYBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

PWRD
PWRD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PWRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWRD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PWRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWRD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYBX vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYBXPWRDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.18

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

7.20

+0.14

HYBX vs. PWRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the PWRD Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYBX and PWRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYBX vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBX drawdown since its inception was -3.93%, smaller than the maximum PWRD drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBX and PWRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYBXPWRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-25.87%

+21.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.15%

-14.12%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-5.57%

+5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-5.06%

+4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

4.28%

-3.61%

Volatility

HYBX vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX) is 0.91%, while TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) has a volatility of 11.82%. This indicates that HYBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYBXPWRDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

11.82%

-10.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

21.30%

-16.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.62%

25.80%

-19.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.54%

22.99%

-15.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.54%

22.99%

-15.45%

HYBX vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRD's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYBX vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison

HYBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, more than PWRD's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYBX
TCW High Yield Bond ETF
7.68%7.82%1.08%0.00%0.00%
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
0.05%0.22%0.49%0.78%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYBX and PWRD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWRD has higher volatility (11.82%) compared to HYBX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBX dropped -3.93% vs PWRD's -25.87%.

On 1-year performance, PWRD leads with 30.69% vs 4.91% for HYBX. On fees, HYBX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HYBX has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PWRD has performed better with a 30.69% return vs 4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYBX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.

HYBX has the higher dividend yield at 7.68%, compared with 0.05% for PWRD.

HYBX is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while PWRD is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYBX and 0.75% for PWRD.

PWRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYBX and PWRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer