PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYBX vs. GRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYBX vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HYBX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
2.01%
6M
1.87%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRW

1D
-2.03%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYBX vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYBX and GRW is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYBX vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYBX
HYBX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HYBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GRW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYBX vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYBXGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.05

HYBX vs. GRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYBXGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

-1.44

+2.12

Drawdowns

HYBX vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBX drawdown since its inception was -3.93%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -2.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBX and GRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYBXGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-2.30%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-2.30%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.57%

-0.53%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

Volatility

HYBX vs. GRW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYBXGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.64%

17.04%

-10.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.66%

17.04%

-9.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.66%

17.04%

-9.38%

HYBX vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYBX vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

HYBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
GRW
TCW Durable Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYBX
TCW High Yield Bond ETF
7.75%7.82%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYBX and GRW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYBX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYBX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

HYBX has the higher dividend yield at 7.75%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

HYBX is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while GRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYBX and 0.75% for GRW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYBX and GRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer