HYBX vs. GRW
HYBX (TCW High Yield Bond ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYBX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by TCW, while GRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYBX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.
Performance
HYBX vs. GRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HYBX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRW
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYBX vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HYBX TCW High Yield Bond ETF | 0.34% |
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYBX and GRW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYBX vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank
HYBX
GRW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYBX vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYBX | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYBX vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYBX drawdown since its inception was -3.93%, roughly equal to the maximum GRW drawdown of -3.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBX and GRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYBX | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -3.83% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -2.03% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -1.09% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | — | — |
Volatility
HYBX vs. GRW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYBX | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.62% | 18.02% | -11.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 18.02% | -10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 18.02% | -10.48% |
HYBX vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYBX vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison
HYBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYBX TCW High Yield Bond ETF | 7.68% | 7.82% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYBX and GRW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYBX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYBX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.
HYBX has the higher dividend yield at 7.68%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.
HYBX is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while GRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYBX and 0.75% for GRW.
Find the right allocation for HYBX and GRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer