HYBX vs. FDHY

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

HYBX (TCW High Yield Bond ETF) and FDHY (Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYBX returned 4.91% vs 7.52% for FDHY. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYBX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDHY.

Performance

HYBX vs. FDHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX) and Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYBX achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly higher than FDHY's 2.56% return.

HYBX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 2.89%
• 6M: 2.53%
• 1Y: 4.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDHY

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.56%
• 6M: 2.67%
• 1Y: 7.52%
• 3Y*: 8.98%
• 5Y*: 3.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYBX vs. FDHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HYBX TCW High Yield Bond ETF	2.89%	6.26%	-0.04%
FDHY Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF	2.56%	9.24%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HYBX and FDHY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	0.26

Return for Risk

HYBX vs. FDHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYBX

HYBX Risk / Return Rank: 34
HYBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
HYBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
HYBX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
HYBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
HYBX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FDHY

FDHY Risk / Return Rank: 81
FDHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FDHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FDHY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FDHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FDHY Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYBX vs. FDHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX) and Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HYBX	FDHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	2.12	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	3.24	-2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.43	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	3.55	-1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.33	14.93	-7.60

HYBX vs. FDHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the FDHY Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYBX and FDHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HYBX vs. FDHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBX drawdown since its inception was -3.93%, smaller than the maximum FDHY drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBX and FDHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYBX	FDHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-20.01%	+16.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.15%	-2.12%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-0.08%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.56%	-2.86%	+2.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	0.50%	+0.17%

Volatility

HYBX vs. FDHY - Volatility Comparison

TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) at 0.78%. This indicates that HYBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYBX	FDHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	0.78%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.52%	2.78%	+1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.62%	3.56%	+3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.54%	7.14%	+0.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.54%	8.02%	-0.48%

HYBX vs. FDHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FDHY's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYBX vs. FDHY - Dividend Comparison

HYBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, more than FDHY's 6.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FDHY Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF	6.50%	6.56%	6.58%	6.26%	5.34%	6.09%	5.78%	4.94%	2.55%
HYBX TCW High Yield Bond ETF	7.68%	7.82%	1.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYBX and FDHY in my portfolio?

HYBX and FDHY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYBX or FDHY?

HYBX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to FDHY (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBX dropped -3.93% vs FDHY's -20.01%.

Which ETF is better, HYBX or FDHY?

On 1-year performance, FDHY leads with 7.52% vs 4.91% for HYBX. On fees, FDHY is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HYBX or FDHY?

Over the 1-year period, FDHY has performed better with a 7.52% return vs 4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYBX or FDHY?

FDHY is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYBX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYBX or FDHY?

HYBX has the higher dividend yield at 7.68%, compared with 6.50% for FDHY.

What is the main difference between HYBX and FDHY?

They also come from different issuers: TCW and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYBX and 0.45% for FDHY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.