HYBL vs. HYLB
HYBL (SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF) and HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYBL is actively managed, while HYLB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYBL returned 8.58%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for HYLB. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYBL charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HYLB.
Performance
HYBL vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYBL achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than HYLB's 1.53% return.
HYBL
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 6.35%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYLB
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 6.87%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- —
HYBL vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYBL SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF | 1.11% | 7.78% | 9.12% | 11.86% | -4.72% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.53% | 8.74% | 8.14% | 12.03% | -6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYBL and HYLB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between HYBL and HYLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYBL vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank
HYBL
HYLB
HYBL vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYBL | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.37 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.04 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | 13.06 | -3.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYBL | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.86 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.58 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
HYBL vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYBL drawdown since its inception was -8.46%, smaller than the maximum HYLB drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBL and HYLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYBL | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -22.91% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.41% | -2.27% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.32% | -4.51% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.19% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -2.43% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.53% | +0.13% |
Volatility
HYBL vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL) is 0.68%, while Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that HYBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYBL | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 1.20% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.14% | 2.93% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 3.70% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 7.47% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 8.18% | -3.61% |
HYBL vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYBL has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYBL vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison
HYBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than HYLB's 6.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYBL SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF | 7.12% | 7.22% | 7.88% | 7.93% | 5.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.49% | 6.29% | 6.31% | 5.84% | 5.53% | 4.45% | 5.22% | 5.71% | 5.95% | 5.85% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYBL and HYLB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYLB has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to HYBL (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBL dropped -8.46% vs HYLB's -22.91%.
On 3-year performance, HYLB leads with 8.72% vs 8.58% for HYBL. On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HYBL has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYLB has performed better with a 8.72% return vs 8.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HYBL.
HYBL has the higher dividend yield at 7.12%, compared with 6.49% for HYLB.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HYBL and 0.15% for HYLB.
HYBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYBL and HYLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer