PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXT.TO vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXT.TO vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HXT.TO is traded in CAD, while FEZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FEZ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXT.TO achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 6.59% return. Over the past 10 years, HXT.TO has outperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 12.85%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.68% annualized return.


HXT.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
2.26%
YTD
9.53%
6M
11.58%
1Y
31.00%
3Y*
22.53%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
12.85%

FEZ

1D
0.91%
1M
2.41%
YTD
6.59%
6M
7.34%
1Y
17.54%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXT.TO vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
9.53%28.74%20.94%12.02%-6.27%28.11%5.36%22.18%-7.89%9.77%
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
6.59%31.52%12.34%24.14%-8.84%14.79%2.35%20.85%-8.78%16.35%

Correlation

The correlation between HXT.TO and FEZ is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2010

0.59

The correlation between HXT.TO and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXT.TO vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXT.TO
FEZ

Financial Services

37.3%
25.1%

Energy

15.9%
5.2%

Basic Materials

12.6%
3.7%

Technology

12.0%
16.1%

Industrials

8.9%
22.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
5.5%

Utilities

2.9%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Healthcare

-

5.4%

Financial Services

HXT.TO
37.3%
FEZ
25.1%

Energy

HXT.TO
15.9%
FEZ
5.2%

Basic Materials

HXT.TO
12.6%
FEZ
3.7%

Technology

HXT.TO
12.0%
FEZ
16.1%

Industrials

HXT.TO
8.9%
FEZ
22.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HXT.TO
3.9%
FEZ
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

HXT.TO
3.6%
FEZ
5.5%

Utilities

HXT.TO
2.9%
FEZ
4.8%

Communication Services

HXT.TO
2.4%
FEZ
2.3%

Real Estate

HXT.TO
0.5%
FEZ

-

Healthcare

HXT.TO

-

FEZ
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXT.TO vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXT.TO
HXT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXT.TO vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXT.TOFEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.17

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

1.33

+2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.71

4.49

+14.23

HXT.TO vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXT.TO and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXT.TOFEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

0.95

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.60

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.53

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.29

-0.03

Drawdowns

HXT.TO vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXT.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.13%, roughly equal to the maximum FEZ drawdown of -53.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXT.TO and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXT.TOFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.13%

-53.81%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-13.25%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.36%

-16.21%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.33%

-28.89%

+12.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.48%

-33.95%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-1.27%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.09%

-13.55%

-5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

3.92%

-2.26%

Volatility

HXT.TO vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) is 3.86%, while SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that HXT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXT.TOFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

5.93%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

15.44%

-5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

18.51%

-6.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.79%

21.52%

-8.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

22.00%

-6.83%

HXT.TO vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXT.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

HXT.TO vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.58%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXT.TO and FEZ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXT.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXT.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.

HXT.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while FEZ is Europe Equities. HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for HXT.TO and 0.29% for FEZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXT.TO and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer