PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXQ.TO vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXQ.TO vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HXQ.TO is traded in CAD, while FEZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FEZ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 18.52% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 6.59% return. Over the past 10 years, HXQ.TO has outperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 22.16%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.68% annualized return.


HXQ.TO

1D
1.44%
1M
2.69%
YTD
18.52%
6M
15.98%
1Y
38.04%
3Y*
28.80%
5Y*
20.09%
10Y*
22.16%

FEZ

1D
0.91%
1M
2.41%
YTD
6.59%
6M
7.34%
1Y
17.54%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXQ.TO vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF
18.52%15.05%35.98%51.16%-27.84%26.20%45.58%32.26%6.71%23.12%
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
6.59%31.52%12.34%24.14%-8.84%14.79%2.35%20.85%-8.78%16.35%

Correlation

The correlation between HXQ.TO and FEZ is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2016

0.45

The correlation between HXQ.TO and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXQ.TO vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXQ.TO
FEZ

Technology

55.9%
16.1%

Communication Services

15.8%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
9.8%

Healthcare

4.4%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
5.5%

Industrials

3.1%
22.1%

Utilities

1.4%
4.8%

Basic Materials

1.0%
3.7%

Energy

0.5%
5.2%

Financial Services

0.3%
25.1%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Technology

HXQ.TO
55.9%
FEZ
16.1%

Communication Services

HXQ.TO
15.8%
FEZ
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HXQ.TO
13.2%
FEZ
9.8%

Healthcare

HXQ.TO
4.4%
FEZ
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

HXQ.TO
4.4%
FEZ
5.5%

Industrials

HXQ.TO
3.1%
FEZ
22.1%

Utilities

HXQ.TO
1.4%
FEZ
4.8%

Basic Materials

HXQ.TO
1.0%
FEZ
3.7%

Energy

HXQ.TO
0.5%
FEZ
5.2%

Financial Services

HXQ.TO
0.3%
FEZ
25.1%

Real Estate

HXQ.TO
0.2%
FEZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXQ.TO vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXQ.TO
HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXQ.TO vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXQ.TOFEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.17

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.33

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.84

4.49

+5.36

HXQ.TO vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXQ.TO and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXQ.TOFEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

0.95

+1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.60

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

0.53

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.29

+0.76

Drawdowns

HXQ.TO vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -53.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXQ.TOFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.60%

-53.81%

+22.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-13.25%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-16.21%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.60%

-28.89%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-33.95%

+2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-1.27%

-2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-13.55%

+7.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

3.92%

-0.04%

Volatility

HXQ.TO vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) at 5.93%. This indicates that HXQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXQ.TOFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

5.93%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

15.44%

-2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

18.51%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

21.52%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.89%

22.00%

-1.11%

HXQ.TO vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

HXQ.TO vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.58%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXQ.TO and FEZ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.

HXQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FEZ is Europe Equities. HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.29% for FEZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer