HWWD.L vs. HSTC.L
HWWD.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) and HSTC.L (HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HWWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while HSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HWWD.L returned 11.75%/yr vs -9.33%/yr for HSTC.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HWWD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HSTC.L.
Performance
HWWD.L vs. HSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HWWD.L is traded in USD, while HSTC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSTC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWWD.L achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly higher than HSTC.L's -10.44% return.
HWWD.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 13.55%
- 6M
- 15.30%
- 1Y
- 33.07%
- 3Y*
- 22.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
HSTC.L
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- -10.44%
- 6M
- -11.42%
- 1Y
- -5.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.59%
- 5Y*
- -9.33%
- 10Y*
- —
HWWD.L vs. HSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWWD.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 13.55% | 25.22% | 15.99% | 22.41% | -17.65% | 20.14% | 3.05% |
HSTC.L HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF | -10.44% | 24.93% | 19.35% | -8.81% | -28.01% | -32.60% | 4.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWWD.L and HSTC.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2020 | 0.44 |
HWWD.L vs. HSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
Financial Services
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
-
Industrials
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
-
Communication Services
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
Consumer Cyclical
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
Basic Materials
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
-
Healthcare
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
Energy
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
-
Utilities
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
-
Real Estate
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWWD.L vs. HSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
HWWD.L
HSTC.L
HWWD.L vs. HSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWD.L) and HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWWD.L | HSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 0.99 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | -0.16 | +4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.09 | -0.30 | +16.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWWD.L | HSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | -0.18 | +2.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | -0.23 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | -0.21 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
HWWD.L vs. HSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum HSTC.L drawdown of -74.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWWD.L and HSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWWD.L | HSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -74.88% | +41.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -30.75% | +22.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -34.78% | +19.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.22% | -67.19% | +40.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -54.04% | +53.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -52.82% | +47.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 16.79% | -14.74% |
Volatility
HWWD.L vs. HSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWD.L) is 4.47%, while HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L) has a volatility of 10.79%. This indicates that HWWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWWD.L | HSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 10.79% | -6.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 19.94% | -9.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.35% | 27.17% | -14.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 39.73% | -24.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 39.34% | -23.66% |
HWWD.L vs. HSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWWD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HSTC.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HWWD.L vs. HSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
HWWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while HSTC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSTC.L HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWWD.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 1.30% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.90% | 2.10% | 1.52% | 1.35% | 2.00% | 2.19% | 1.76% | 1.87% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HWWD.L and HSTC.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HWWD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HWWD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HSTC.L.
HWWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while HSTC.L is Technology Equities. HWWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while HSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HWWD.L and 0.50% for HSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for HWWD.L and HSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer