HWWD.L vs. MWRD.L
HWWD.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from HSBC and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HWWD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for MWRD.L.
Performance
HWWD.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HWWD.L is traded in USD, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
HWWD.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 13.55%
- 6M
- 15.30%
- 1Y
- 33.07%
- 3Y*
- 22.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
MWRD.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HWWD.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWWD.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 13.55% | 25.22% | 15.99% | 22.41% | -17.65% | 20.14% | 14.94% | 22.38% | -10.70% | 10.86% |
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World | 0.00% | 0.00% | -1.64% | 23.69% | -18.69% | 22.97% | 15.27% | 28.71% | -9.87% | 10.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWWD.L and MWRD.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between HWWD.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HWWD.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
Financial Services
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
Industrials
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
Communication Services
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
Basic Materials
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
Healthcare
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
Energy
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
Utilities
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
Consumer Defensive
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
Real Estate
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWWD.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
HWWD.L
MWRD.L
HWWD.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWD.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWWD.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWWD.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | — | — |
Drawdowns
HWWD.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWWD.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | — | — |
Volatility
HWWD.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWWD.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.35% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.27% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | — | — |
HWWD.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWWD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HWWD.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
HWWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while MWRD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWWD.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 1.30% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.90% | 2.10% | 1.52% | 1.35% | 2.00% | 2.19% | 1.76% | 1.87% | 2.04% |
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HWWD.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HWWD.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HWWD.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for HWWD.L and MWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer