PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWSIX vs. GTTTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWSIX vs. GTTTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWSIX achieves a 15.63% return, which is significantly lower than GTTTX's 21.95% return. Over the past 10 years, HWSIX has underperformed GTTTX with an annualized return of 11.20%, while GTTTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.


HWSIX

1D
0.35%
1M
1.09%
YTD
15.63%
6M
13.92%
1Y
22.01%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
11.20%

GTTTX

1D
-0.36%
1M
4.37%
YTD
21.95%
6M
19.36%
1Y
44.12%
3Y*
32.42%
5Y*
15.58%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWSIX vs. GTTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWSIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund
15.63%1.60%5.00%18.85%2.97%35.54%-0.31%20.54%-15.03%7.66%
GTTTX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class
21.95%12.83%45.27%17.37%-13.66%32.94%0.21%23.37%-10.83%7.34%

Correlation

The correlation between HWSIX and GTTTX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.93

The correlation between HWSIX and GTTTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWSIX vs. GTTTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWSIX
HWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

GTTTX
GTTTX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GTTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWSIX vs. GTTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HWSIXGTTTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

5.06

-2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

17.80

-10.17

HWSIX vs. GTTTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the GTTTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWSIX and GTTTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HWSIX vs. GTTTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWSIX drawdown since its inception was -72.00%, which is greater than GTTTX's maximum drawdown of -56.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWSIX and GTTTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWSIXGTTTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.00%

-56.58%

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-9.16%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.92%

-39.29%

+12.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.92%

-39.29%

+12.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.67%

-47.29%

-6.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-0.36%

-2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.06%

-9.91%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.59%

+0.47%

Volatility

HWSIX vs. GTTTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) is 3.91%, while Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that HWSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTTTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWSIXGTTTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

5.40%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

12.69%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.15%

18.66%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

35.35%

-13.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.59%

30.81%

-6.22%

HWSIX vs. GTTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWSIX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than GTTTX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWSIX vs. GTTTX - Dividend Comparison

HWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than GTTTX's 6.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTTTX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class
6.88%8.39%52.07%1.87%3.85%40.18%0.90%0.90%12.37%11.87%4.51%7.00%
HWSIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund
0.87%1.01%8.35%1.90%13.44%0.36%0.80%4.89%9.84%5.07%0.41%11.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWSIX and GTTTX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTTTX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to HWSIX (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWSIX dropped -72.00% vs GTTTX's -56.58%.

GTTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWSIX and GTTTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer