HWMIX vs. NMAVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX).
HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997. NMAVX is managed by Nuance Investments. It was launched on Dec 31, 2013.
Performance
HWMIX vs. NMAVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWMIX vs. NMAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.74% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.01% | 1.91% | 5.20% | 6.44% | -5.26% | 11.10% | 4.41% | 30.71% | -5.44% | 14.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWMIX achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly higher than NMAVX's 2.01% return. Over the past 10 years, HWMIX has outperformed NMAVX with an annualized return of 9.08%, while NMAVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.67% annualized return.
HWMIX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
NMAVX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 4.85%
- 1Y
- 10.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 7.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWMIX vs. NMAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than NMAVX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWMIX vs. NMAVX — Risk / Return Rank
HWMIX
NMAVX
HWMIX vs. NMAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWMIX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 0.73 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.17 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.14 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.09 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 3.40 | +2.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWMIX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.73 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.23 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.51 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.50 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWMIX and NMAVX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWMIX vs. NMAVX - Dividend Comparison
HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than NMAVX's 0.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.98% | 1.00% | 7.55% | 1.78% | 9.05% | 11.98% | 0.61% | 5.91% | 7.16% | 7.05% | 1.83% | 4.24% |
Drawdowns
HWMIX vs. NMAVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, which is greater than NMAVX's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and NMAVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWMIX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.84% | -30.93% | -38.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.87% | -9.80% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -18.40% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -30.93% | -32.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -7.84% | +4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -3.77% | -7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 3.15% | +1.00% |
Volatility
HWMIX vs. NMAVX - Volatility Comparison
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) at 3.80%. This indicates that HWMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWMIX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 3.80% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 7.63% | +4.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.86% | 14.28% | +9.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 13.21% | +9.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.62% | 15.05% | +10.57% |