HWMIX vs. FVCSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

HWMIX (Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund) and FVCSX (Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HWMIX returned 10.53%/yr vs 10.34%/yr for FVCSX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HWMIX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.92%/yr for FVCSX.

Performance

HWMIX vs. FVCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWMIX achieves a 21.22% return, which is significantly lower than FVCSX's 28.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HWMIX having a 10.53% annualized return and FVCSX not far behind at 10.34%.

HWMIX

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 6.73%
• 6M: 15.52%
• YTD: 21.22%
• 1Y: 35.99%
• 3Y*: 12.62%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 10.53%
• ALL TIME*: 11.36%

FVCSX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.97%
• 6M: 18.57%
• YTD: 28.24%
• 1Y: 42.56%
• 3Y*: 10.30%
• 5Y*: 8.61%
• 10Y*: 10.34%
• ALL TIME*: 6.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FVCSX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

HWMIX vs. FVCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund	21.22%	7.87%	3.62%	19.87%	1.63%	39.18%	0.49%	12.97%	-19.32%	7.69%
FVCSX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C	28.24%	7.23%	-6.69%	19.32%	-8.35%	31.94%	7.10%	33.09%	-17.58%	16.92%

Correlation

The correlation between HWMIX and FVCSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996	0.84

The correlation between HWMIX and FVCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HWMIX vs. FVCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HWMIX

HWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
HWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
HWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
HWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
HWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FVCSX

FVCSX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FVCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FVCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FVCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FVCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FVCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HWMIX vs. FVCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HWMIX	FVCSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.29	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.26	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.39	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	3.93	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.76	15.12	-2.35

HWMIX vs. FVCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the FVCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWMIX and FVCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HWMIX vs. FVCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, roughly equal to the maximum FVCSX drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and FVCSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HWMIX	FVCSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.84%	-70.38%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-9.89%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.90%	-37.07%	+11.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.90%	-37.07%	+11.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.21%	-48.07%	-15.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-0.94%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.78%	-11.14%	+0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	2.58%	-0.06%

Volatility

HWMIX vs. FVCSX - Volatility Comparison

Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX) at 3.27%. This indicates that HWMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HWMIX	FVCSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	3.27%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.69%	11.74%	-1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.92%	17.02%	-1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.90%	20.97%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.32%	22.13%	+3.19%

HWMIX vs. FVCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FVCSX's 1.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

HWMIX vs. FVCSX - Dividend Comparison

HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than FVCSX's 10.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FVCSX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C	10.20%	13.08%	0.00%	2.96%	2.23%	9.80%	0.33%	5.50%	18.83%	8.78%	25.66%	0.43%
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund	1.15%	1.39%	1.15%	0.28%	0.49%	1.28%	2.25%	1.60%	2.99%	6.72%	1.53%	14.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HWMIX and FVCSX in my portfolio?

HWMIX and FVCSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HWMIX or FVCSX?

HWMIX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to FVCSX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWMIX dropped -69.84% vs FVCSX's -70.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FVCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.