PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVCSX vs. FSOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVCSX vs. FSOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FVCSX having a 23.46% return and FSOAX slightly higher at 23.90%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FVCSX having a 10.02% annualized return and FSOAX not far behind at 9.92%.


FVCSX

1D
1.22%
1M
4.35%
YTD
23.46%
6M
21.76%
1Y
40.29%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
10.02%

FSOAX

1D
1.23%
1M
4.41%
YTD
23.90%
6M
10.67%
1Y
28.01%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
9.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVCSX vs. FSOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVCSX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C
23.46%7.23%-6.69%19.32%-8.35%31.94%7.10%33.09%-17.58%16.92%
FSOAX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A
23.90%-2.17%-3.64%20.24%-7.61%32.95%7.95%34.16%-17.02%17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FVCSX and FSOAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1993

0.91

The correlation between FVCSX and FSOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVCSX vs. FSOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVCSX
FVCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FVCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FVCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FSOAX
FSOAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FSOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FSOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVCSX vs. FSOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVCSXFSOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.28

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

2.50

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.31

8.71

+6.60

FVCSX vs. FSOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVCSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the FSOAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVCSX and FSOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVCSX vs. FSOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVCSX drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, roughly equal to the maximum FSOAX drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVCSX and FSOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVCSXFSOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.38%

-70.02%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-11.56%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.07%

-35.33%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.07%

-35.33%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.07%

-47.99%

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-1.57%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.17%

-9.98%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

3.31%

-0.63%

Volatility

FVCSX vs. FSOAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX) have volatilities of 5.18% and 5.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVCSXFSOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

5.17%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

16.10%

-3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

19.95%

-2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.09%

21.30%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.22%

22.32%

-0.10%

FVCSX vs. FSOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVCSX has a 1.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOAX's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVCSX vs. FSOAX - Dividend Comparison

FVCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.59%, while FSOAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSOAX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.90%2.43%8.70%0.82%5.59%17.03%7.64%22.64%1.10%
FVCSX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C
10.59%13.08%0.00%2.96%2.23%9.80%0.33%5.50%18.83%8.78%25.66%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FVCSX and FSOAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FVCSX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to FSOAX (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVCSX dropped -70.38% vs FSOAX's -70.02%.

FVCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVCSX and FSOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer