HWMIX vs. FASEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX).
HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997. FASEX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 22, 1987.
Performance
HWMIX vs. FASEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWMIX vs. FASEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.50% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
FASEX Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund | 6.21% | 9.68% | 10.40% | 14.20% | -10.63% | 34.84% | 1.19% | 26.68% | -13.00% | 19.23% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HWMIX having a 6.50% return and FASEX slightly lower at 6.21%. Over the past 10 years, HWMIX has underperformed FASEX with an annualized return of 9.06%, while FASEX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.
HWMIX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 6.50%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
FASEX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 6.21%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 19.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWMIX vs. FASEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FASEX's 1.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWMIX vs. FASEX — Risk / Return Rank
HWMIX
FASEX
HWMIX vs. FASEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWMIX | FASEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.11 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.62 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.61 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 7.22 | -1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWMIX | FASEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.11 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.47 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.51 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.51 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWMIX and FASEX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWMIX vs. FASEX - Dividend Comparison
HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than FASEX's 13.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
FASEX Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund | 13.81% | 14.67% | 5.29% | 3.12% | 6.32% | 4.02% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 4.48% | 7.93% | 3.67% | 3.49% |
Drawdowns
HWMIX vs. FASEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, which is greater than FASEX's maximum drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and FASEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWMIX | FASEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.84% | -55.57% | -14.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -8.19% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -22.26% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -44.56% | -18.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -3.58% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -8.97% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 3.03% | +1.13% |
Volatility
HWMIX vs. FASEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) is 4.20%, while Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that HWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWMIX | FASEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 5.87% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 10.19% | +2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.85% | 18.86% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 18.07% | +4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.61% | 20.18% | +5.43% |