HWM vs. SMR
HWM (Howmet Aerospace Inc.) and SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — HWM in Aerospace & Defense, SMR in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 5 years, HWM returned 50.00%/yr vs -0.32%/yr for SMR. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HWM vs. SMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWM achieves a 29.23% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -30.20% return.
HWM
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- 29.23%
- 6M
- 33.60%
- 1Y
- 54.66%
- 3Y*
- 79.69%
- 5Y*
- 50.00%
- 10Y*
- 33.28%
SMR
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -17.31%
- YTD
- -30.20%
- 6M
- -46.07%
- 1Y
- -75.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- —
HWM vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 29.23% | 87.95% | 102.71% | 37.84% | 24.16% | 11.67% | 12.14% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -30.20% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | -0.89% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWM and SMR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
HWM:
$106.66B
SMR:
$3.16B
HWM:
$4.31
SMR:
-$2.02
HWM:
12.42
SMR:
104.42
HWM:
19.32
SMR:
2.71
HWM:
$8.62B
SMR:
$18.10M
HWM:
$2.81B
SMR:
$4.45M
HWM:
$2.66B
SMR:
-$696.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWM vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank
HWM
SMR
HWM vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HWM | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.87 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | -0.91 | +4.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | -1.32 | +11.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HWM vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWM drawdown since its inception was -88.30%, roughly equal to the maximum SMR drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWM and SMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWM | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.30% | -87.47% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -82.86% | +66.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.41% | -82.86% | +63.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.61% | -87.47% | +65.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -81.49% | +78.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.00% | -35.08% | +4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | 57.39% | -51.78% |
Volatility
HWM vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) is 11.03%, while NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a volatility of 28.93%. This indicates that HWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWM | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | 28.93% | -17.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.03% | 69.57% | -44.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.46% | 102.59% | -71.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.20% | 93.50% | -61.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.82% | 89.31% | -49.49% |
Dividends
HWM vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison
HWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HWM vs. SMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and NuScale Power Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HWM and SMR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (28.93%) compared to HWM (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWM dropped -88.30% vs SMR's -87.47%.
HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HWM and SMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer