HWC vs. XOM
HWC (Hancock Whitney Corporation) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. HWC operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while XOM operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, HWC returned 13.98%/yr vs 9.11%/yr for XOM. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HWC vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWC achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 16.62% return. Over the past 10 years, HWC has outperformed XOM with an annualized return of 13.98%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.11% annualized return.
HWC
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 35.09%
- 3Y*
- 27.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
XOM
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -10.62%
- YTD
- 16.62%
- 6M
- 18.78%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 20.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
HWC vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWC Hancock Whitney Corporation | 12.81% | 20.02% | 16.07% | 3.30% | -1.23% | 50.58% | -19.11% | 30.21% | -28.49% | 17.20% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 16.62% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWC and XOM is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HWC and XOM has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
HWC:
$5.82B
XOM:
$579.22B
HWC:
$4.90
XOM:
$5.93
HWC:
14.46
XOM:
23.36
HWC:
3.82
XOM:
1.08
HWC:
3.91
XOM:
1.81
HWC:
1.32
XOM:
2.28
HWC:
$1.53B
XOM:
$326.01B
HWC:
$1.12B
XOM:
$83.11B
HWC:
$496.74M
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWC vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
HWC
XOM
HWC vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HWC | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.18 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.29 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | 3.90 | +0.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HWC vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWC drawdown since its inception was -70.93%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWC and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWC | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.93% | -62.40% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.45% | -19.08% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.77% | -19.08% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.90% | -20.51% | -21.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.93% | -61.34% | -9.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -18.70% | +15.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.40% | -10.21% | -11.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 6.36% | +1.04% |
Volatility
HWC vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) is 6.03%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that HWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWC | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 7.89% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.31% | 20.78% | -3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.35% | 24.89% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.04% | 26.70% | +6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.27% | 28.25% | +11.02% |
Dividends
HWC vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
HWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than XOM's 2.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWC Hancock Whitney Corporation | 2.68% | 2.83% | 2.74% | 2.47% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 3.17% | 2.46% | 2.94% | 1.94% | 2.23% | 3.81% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.95% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
HWC vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hancock Whitney Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HWC and XOM have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOM has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to HWC (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWC dropped -70.93% vs XOM's -62.40%.
HWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HWC and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer