HWC vs. KRE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE).

KRE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006.

Performance

HWC vs. KRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HWC vs. KRE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HWC Hancock Whitney Corporation	0.62%	20.02%	16.07%	3.30%	-1.23%	50.58%	-19.11%	30.21%	-28.49%	17.20%
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF	1.11%	10.21%	18.58%	-7.61%	-15.08%	39.29%	-7.43%	27.44%	-18.81%	7.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWC achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than KRE's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, HWC has outperformed KRE with an annualized return of 13.95%, while KRE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.29% annualized return.

HWC

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: -2.64%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 3.07%
• 1Y: 24.95%
• 3Y*: 24.14%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 13.95%

KRE

• 1D: 2.42%
• 1M: -1.86%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 4.17%
• 1Y: 17.51%
• 3Y*: 17.48%
• 5Y*: 2.24%
• 10Y*: 8.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HWC vs. KRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWC

HWC Risk / Return Rank: 68
HWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
HWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
HWC Omega Ratio Rank: 65
HWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
HWC Martin Ratio Rank: 72

KRE

KRE Risk / Return Rank: 40
KRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
KRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
KRE Omega Ratio Rank: 39
KRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
KRE Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWC vs. KRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HWC	KRE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	0.63	+0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	1.00	+0.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.15	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	1.23	+0.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.84	3.07	+0.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HWC vs. KRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWC Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the KRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWC and KRE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HWC	KRE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	0.63	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.07	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.26	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.12	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between HWC and KRE is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HWC vs. KRE - Dividend Comparison

HWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than KRE's 2.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HWC Hancock Whitney Corporation	2.91%	2.83%	2.74%	2.47%	2.23%	2.16%	3.17%	2.46%	2.94%	1.94%	2.23%	3.81%
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF	2.42%	2.45%	2.59%	2.99%	2.51%	1.97%	2.78%	2.21%	2.48%	1.40%	1.40%	1.80%

Drawdowns

HWC vs. KRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWC drawdown since its inception was -70.93%, roughly equal to the maximum KRE drawdown of -68.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWC and KRE.

Drawdown Indicators

	HWC	KRE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.93%	-68.54%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.45%	-14.95%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.90%	-52.69%	+10.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.93%	-54.92%	-16.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.89%	-11.00%	-2.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.52%	-22.05%	+0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.86%	6.00%	+0.86%

Volatility

HWC vs. KRE - Volatility Comparison

Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) at 5.28%. This indicates that HWC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HWC	KRE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.71%	5.28%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.24%	17.94%	+2.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.70%	28.13%	+2.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.75%	30.07%	+3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.35%	31.96%	+7.39%