HWC vs. RF
Compare and contrast key facts about Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HWC or RF.
Correlation
The correlation between HWC and RF is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HWC vs. RF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HWC:
0.66
RF:
1.10
HWC:
1.24
RF:
1.73
HWC:
1.14
RF:
1.21
HWC:
0.97
RF:
1.21
HWC:
2.80
RF:
4.76
HWC:
7.84%
RF:
6.04%
HWC:
33.38%
RF:
26.23%
HWC:
-70.93%
RF:
-92.65%
HWC:
-9.06%
RF:
-12.37%
Fundamentals
HWC:
$4.71B
RF:
$21.38B
HWC:
$4.46
RF:
$1.77
HWC:
12.27
RF:
13.29
HWC:
$1.26B
RF:
$6.37B
HWC:
$1.08B
RF:
$6.96B
HWC:
$447.04M
RF:
$1.88B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWC achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than RF's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, HWC has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 10.44%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.18% annualized return.
HWC
0.77%
-6.49%
20.12%
20.72%
7.90%
10.44%
RF
1.40%
-9.18%
21.01%
27.95%
12.11%
13.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HWC vs. RF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HWC
RF
HWC vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HWC vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
HWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than RF's 4.11% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWC Hancock Whitney Corporation | 2.72% | 2.74% | 2.47% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 3.17% | 2.46% | 2.94% | 1.94% | 2.23% | 3.81% | 3.13% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.11% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
HWC vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWC drawdown since its inception was -70.93%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWC and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HWC vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 7.46%. This indicates that HWC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
HWC vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hancock Whitney Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities