HWAY vs. SEA

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HWAY (Themes US Infrastructure ETF) and SEA (U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HWAY is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Solactive United States Infrastructure Index, while SEA is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HWAY returned 32.92% vs 39.66% for SEA. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HWAY charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SEA.

Performance

HWAY vs. SEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWAY achieves a 22.94% return, which is significantly lower than SEA's 30.53% return.

HWAY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.03%
• 6M: 12.94%
• YTD: 22.94%
• 1Y: 32.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.86%

SEA

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 10.87%
• 6M: 19.99%
• YTD: 30.53%
• 1Y: 39.66%
• 3Y*: 18.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HWAY Themes US Infrastructure ETF	$22.82K	$23.54K	$29.88K
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF	$132.51K	$401.66K	$242.27K

HWAY vs. SEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HWAY Themes US Infrastructure ETF	22.94%	19.99%	4.42%
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF	30.53%	16.78%	-6.97%

Correlation

The correlation between HWAY and SEA is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024	0.44

HWAY vs. SEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HWAY	SEA
Industrials	77.9%	95.5%
Basic Materials	20.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.5%	-
Energy	0.2%	3.5%
Utilities	0.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Technology	0.0%	0.1%
Communication Services	-	-0.1%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

HWAY vs. SEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HWAY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SEA

SEA Risk / Return Rank: 89
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HWAY vs. SEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HWAY	SEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	2.36	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	3.28	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.40	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	3.74	-1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.98	13.87	-5.89

HWAY vs. SEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the SEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWAY and SEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HWAY vs. SEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWAY drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, smaller than the maximum SEA drawdown of -39.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWAY and SEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	HWAY	SEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-39.53%	+13.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.63%	-10.67%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.57%	-0.04%	-4.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-13.88%	+8.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.73%	2.87%	+0.86%

Volatility

HWAY vs. SEA - Volatility Comparison

Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) at 4.20%. This indicates that HWAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HWAY	SEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	4.20%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.68%	13.07%	+3.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.52%	16.93%	+3.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.22%	21.55%	+0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.22%	21.55%	+0.67%

HWAY vs. SEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWAY has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SEA's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HWAY vs. SEA - Dividend Comparison

HWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HWAY Themes US Infrastructure ETF	1.05%	1.29%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF	5.18%	6.76%	18.47%	9.85%	18.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HWAY and SEA in my portfolio?

HWAY and SEA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HWAY or SEA?

HWAY has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to SEA (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWAY dropped -25.96% vs SEA's -39.53%.

Which ETF is better, HWAY or SEA?

On 1-year performance, SEA leads with 39.66% vs 32.92% for HWAY. On fees, HWAY is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SEA has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HWAY or SEA?

Over the 1-year period, SEA has performed better with a 39.66% return vs 32.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HWAY or SEA?

HWAY is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HWAY or SEA?

SEA has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 1.05% for HWAY.

What is the main difference between HWAY and SEA?

HWAY is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while SEA is Industrials Equities. HWAY tracks Solactive United States Infrastructure Index, while SEA tracks U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Themes and US Global. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HWAY and 0.60% for SEA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.