HUTL.TO vs. XQQ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO).
HUTL.TO and XQQ.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUTL.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jan 10, 2019. XQQ.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. It was launched on May 3, 2011.
Performance
HUTL.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUTL.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 11.42% | 15.59% | 14.70% | 3.11% | -4.97% | 16.04% | -10.64% | 13.96% |
XQQ.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -6.47% | 18.38% | 24.23% | 52.23% | -33.67% | 22.29% | 45.23% | 28.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUTL.TO achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than XQQ.TO's -6.47% return.
HUTL.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
XQQ.TO
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- -6.47%
- 6M
- -4.62%
- 1Y
- 21.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 16.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUTL.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUTL.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than XQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HUTL.TO vs. XQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUTL.TO
XQQ.TO
HUTL.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUTL.TO | XQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | 0.95 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 1.50 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.21 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 1.65 | +1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 5.80 | +5.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUTL.TO | XQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 0.95 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.47 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | -1.32 | +1.83 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUTL.TO and XQQ.TO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HUTL.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
HUTL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, more than XQQ.TO's 0.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 7.34% | 7.94% | 8.30% | 8.56% | 8.13% | 7.16% | 7.73% | 5.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XQQ.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.27% | 0.25% | 0.32% | 0.31% | 0.43% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.62% |
Drawdowns
HUTL.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUTL.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, smaller than the maximum XQQ.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTL.TO and XQQ.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUTL.TO | XQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.00% | -100.00% | +66.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -12.76% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | -38.55% | +18.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -99.98% | +99.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -99.99% | +93.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 3.63% | -1.96% |
Volatility
HUTL.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) is 3.63%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that HUTL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUTL.TO | XQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 6.56% | -2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.70% | 12.66% | -5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 22.22% | -8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.83% | 22.54% | -9.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 22.29% | -7.00% |