HUTL.TO vs. UTES

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

HUTL.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF) and UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HUTL.TO returned 8.17%/yr vs 16.79%/yr for UTES. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HUTL.TO charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for UTES.

Performance

HUTL.TO vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HUTL.TO is traded in CAD, while UTES is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UTES values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUTL.TO achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 0.90% return.

HUTL.TO

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 4.29%
• YTD: 9.80%
• 1Y: 13.07%
• 3Y*: 15.09%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.57%

UTES

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: -5.97%
• 6M: 3.72%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 1Y: -4.67%
• 3Y*: 24.09%
• 5Y*: 16.79%
• 10Y*: 12.77%
• ALL TIME*: 13.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF	CA$1.01M	CA$1.14M	CA$1.22M
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	CA$16.61M	CA$14.58M	CA$19.26M

HUTL.TO vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF	9.80%	15.59%	14.70%	3.11%	-4.97%	16.04%	-10.64%	17.34%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	0.90%	19.97%	57.66%	-4.78%	7.19%	20.68%	-2.67%	24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HUTL.TO and UTES is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2019	0.44

The correlation between HUTL.TO and UTES shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HUTL.TO vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUTL.TO	UTES
Utilities	42.7%	100.0%
Communication Services	36.8%	-
Energy	16.9%	-
Industrials	3.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

HUTL.TO vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HUTL.TO

HUTL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 51
HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
HUTL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
HUTL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
HUTL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
HUTL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

UTES

UTES Risk / Return Rank: 6
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 7
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HUTL.TO vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUTL.TO	UTES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	-0.21	+1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	-0.15	+1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.98	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	-0.29	+3.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.27	-0.60	+7.86

HUTL.TO vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUTL.TO and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HUTL.TO vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTL.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -29.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTL.TO and UTES.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUTL.TO	UTES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.00%	-29.41%	-4.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.54%	-16.37%	+11.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.39%	-19.32%	+10.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.71%	-19.32%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.45%	-10.80%	+7.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.56%	-5.71%	-0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	7.90%	-6.10%

Volatility

HUTL.TO vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) is 3.99%, while Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that HUTL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUTL.TO	UTES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	5.90%	-1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.33%	16.69%	-7.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.77%	21.93%	-11.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.05%	21.73%	-8.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.19%	21.30%	-6.11%

HUTL.TO vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTL.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUTL.TO vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

HUTL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, more than UTES's 1.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF	7.88%	7.94%	8.30%	8.56%	8.13%	7.16%	7.73%	6.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	1.54%	1.42%	1.51%	2.44%	2.13%	1.94%	2.09%	1.84%	2.09%	3.44%	3.53%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUTL.TO and UTES in my portfolio?

HUTL.TO and UTES have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUTL.TO or UTES?

On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUTL.TO or UTES?

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for HUTL.TO.

What is the main difference between HUTL.TO and UTES?

They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for HUTL.TO and 0.49% for UTES.