HUTL.TO vs. UMVP.TO
HUTL.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF) and UMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. HUTL.TO is actively managed, while UMVP.TO is passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HUTL.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HUTL.TO
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
UMVP.TO
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HUTL.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 8.49% |
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF | 14.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUTL.TO and UMVP.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUTL.TO vs. UMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUTL.TO
UMVP.TO
HUTL.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUTL.TO | UMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUTL.TO | UMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 5.03 | -4.54 |
Drawdowns
HUTL.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUTL.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, which is greater than UMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -4.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTL.TO and UMVP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUTL.TO | UMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.00% | -4.57% | -29.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.10% | -0.96% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -0.81% | -5.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | — | — |
Volatility
HUTL.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUTL.TO | UMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.23% | 9.11% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 9.11% | +3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.25% | 9.11% | +6.14% |
Dividends
HUTL.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison
HUTL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, more than UMVP.TO's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 7.66% | 7.94% | 8.30% | 8.56% | 8.13% | 7.16% | 7.73% | 5.33% |
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUTL.TO and UMVP.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Hamilton.
Find the right allocation for HUTL.TO and UMVP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer