HUTL.TO vs. HTA.TO
HUTL.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF) and HTA.TO (Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUTL.TO is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Harvest, while HTA.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HUTL.TO returned 8.58%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for HTA.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HUTL.TO charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for HTA.TO.
Performance
HUTL.TO vs. HTA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUTL.TO achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly lower than HTA.TO's 25.06% return.
HUTL.TO
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 16.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
HTA.TO
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 13.51%
- YTD
- 25.06%
- 6M
- 25.58%
- 1Y
- 42.83%
- 3Y*
- 26.23%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 20.74%
HUTL.TO vs. HTA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 10.54% | 15.59% | 14.70% | 3.11% | -4.97% | 16.04% | -10.64% | 13.96% |
HTA.TO Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF | 25.06% | 12.42% | 23.53% | 52.86% | -32.21% | 42.59% | 30.02% | 25.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUTL.TO and HTA.TO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2019 | 0.21 |
The correlation between HUTL.TO and HTA.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (3 years) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HUTL.TO vs. HTA.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HUTL.TO
HTA.TO
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
HUTL.TO
HTA.TO
-
Communication Services
HUTL.TO
HTA.TO
Energy
HUTL.TO
HTA.TO
-
Industrials
HUTL.TO
HTA.TO
-
Basic Materials
HUTL.TO
-
HTA.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HUTL.TO
-
HTA.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HUTL.TO
-
HTA.TO
-
Financial Services
HUTL.TO
-
HTA.TO
-
Healthcare
HUTL.TO
-
HTA.TO
-
Real Estate
HUTL.TO
-
HTA.TO
-
Technology
HUTL.TO
-
HTA.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUTL.TO vs. HTA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUTL.TO
HTA.TO
HUTL.TO vs. HTA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUTL.TO | HTA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.39 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.61 | 2.89 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 9.84 | +1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUTL.TO | HTA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.40 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.75 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.73 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
HUTL.TO vs. HTA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUTL.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, smaller than the maximum HTA.TO drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTL.TO and HTA.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUTL.TO | HTA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.00% | -38.77% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.62% | -14.87% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.91% | -25.02% | +15.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | -38.77% | +19.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -1.84% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -8.23% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 4.36% | -2.92% |
Volatility
HUTL.TO vs. HTA.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) is 4.17%, while Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that HUTL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUTL.TO | HTA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 5.80% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.27% | 14.59% | -6.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.22% | 17.91% | -7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 23.52% | -10.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 23.08% | -7.84% |
HUTL.TO vs. HTA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUTL.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than HTA.TO's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUTL.TO vs. HTA.TO - Dividend Comparison
HUTL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, less than HTA.TO's 7.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTA.TO Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF | 7.77% | 8.80% | 8.11% | 7.81% | 9.99% | 4.27% | 5.52% | 6.12% | 7.58% | 7.03% | 8.74% | 5.29% |
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 7.64% | 7.94% | 8.30% | 8.56% | 8.13% | 7.16% | 7.73% | 5.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUTL.TO and HTA.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HUTL.TO is cheaper at 0.67% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HUTL.TO is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HTA.TO.
HUTL.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while HTA.TO is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for HUTL.TO and 0.99% for HTA.TO.
Find the right allocation for HUTL.TO and HTA.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer