FTS vs. BIPC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fortis Inc (FTS) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FTS or BIPC.TO.
Key characteristics
| FTS | BIPC.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.89% | 30.57% |
| 1Y Return | 13.15% | 50.18% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.13% | 5.87% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.90 | 1.60 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.38 | 2.21 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.47 | 7.85 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.01% | 5.61% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.40% | 27.58% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.36% | -44.91% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.38% | -5.01% |
Fundamentals
| FTS | BIPC.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $22.04B | CA$7.86B |
| EPS | $2.32 | -CA$7.30 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $8.91B | CA$2.73B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $3.72B | CA$1.72B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $2.56B | CA$3.20B |
Correlation
The correlation between FTS and BIPC.TO is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FTS vs. BIPC.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FTS achieves a 10.89% return, which is significantly lower than BIPC.TO's 30.57% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FTS vs. BIPC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc (FTS) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FTS vs. BIPC.TO - Dividend Comparison
FTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than BIPC.TO's 2.68% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS Fortis Inc | 3.92% | 4.11% | 4.18% | 3.40% | 3.54% | 3.31% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.72% |
BIPC.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation | 2.68% | 3.27% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FTS vs. BIPC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTS drawdown since its inception was -34.36%, smaller than the maximum BIPC.TO drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS and BIPC.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FTS vs. BIPC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fortis Inc (FTS) is 5.25%, while Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC.TO) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that FTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIPC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FTS vs. BIPC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortis Inc and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities