PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUT vs. ANAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HUT vs. ANAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUT achieves a 134.28% return, which is significantly higher than ANAB's 65.10% return.


HUT

1D
-0.59%
1M
1.74%
6M
92.78%
YTD
134.28%
1Y
406.97%
3Y*
85.18%
5Y*
35.40%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.81%

ANAB

1D
-3.05%
1M
-18.45%
6M
68.83%
YTD
65.10%
1Y
226.03%
3Y*
57.31%
5Y*
28.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$39.97M$46.98M$40.05M
$525.36M$446.23M$513.46M

HUT vs. ANAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.
134.28%124.21%53.60%213.88%-89.17%185.45%250.63%-25.02%-70.80%
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.
65.10%266.16%-38.19%-30.88%-10.82%61.63%32.31%-74.53%-48.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HUT and ANAB is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HUT:

$12.12B

ANAB:

$2.30B

EPS

HUT:

-$2.77

ANAB:

-$0.90

PB Ratio

HUT:

8.66

ANAB:

120.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

HUT:

-$40.96M

ANAB:

$232.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HUT:

-$132.19M

ANAB:

$245.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

HUT:

-$306.16M

ANAB:

$52.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUT vs. ANAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HUT
HUT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ANAB
ANAB Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ANAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HUT vs. ANAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUTANABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.45

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.62

8.14

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.07

19.84

+6.23

HUT vs. ANAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUT Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is comparable to the ANAB Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUT and ANAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUT vs. ANAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUT drawdown since its inception was -95.04%, roughly equal to the maximum ANAB drawdown of -92.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUT and ANAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUTANABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.04%

-92.08%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.62%

-27.96%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.08%

-69.32%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.04%

-69.32%

-25.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.09%

-37.74%

+18.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.83%

-64.17%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.71%

11.45%

+4.26%

Volatility

HUT vs. ANAB - Volatility Comparison

Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) has a higher volatility of 37.29% compared to AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) at 27.46%. This indicates that HUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUTANABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.29%

27.46%

+9.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.96%

51.26%

+25.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.84%

73.55%

+34.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.81%

66.36%

+39.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.67%

75.51%

+39.16%

Dividends

HUT vs. ANAB - Dividend Comparison

Neither HUT nor ANAB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

HUT vs. ANAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hut 8 Corp. and AnaptysBio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HUT and ANAB have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUT has higher volatility (37.29%) compared to ANAB (27.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUT dropped -95.04% vs ANAB's -92.08%.

HUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUT and ANAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer