LEXCX vs. LLY
LEXCX (Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund) is Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Voya, while LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, LEXCX returned 11.44%/yr vs 33.08%/yr for LLY. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LEXCX vs. LLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEXCX achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's 2.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LEXCX has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 11.44%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 33.08% annualized return.
LEXCX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 14.68%
- 1Y
- 17.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
LLY
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 45.51%
- 3Y*
- 34.88%
- 5Y*
- 39.70%
- 10Y*
- 33.08%
LEXCX vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEXCX Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund | 14.99% | 7.04% | 3.60% | 14.53% | 3.95% | 26.77% | 4.36% | 21.43% | -5.44% | 16.61% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 2.90% | 40.25% | 33.30% | 60.91% | 34.26% | 66.08% | 31.04% | 16.14% | 40.45% | 17.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEXCX and LLY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1986 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LEXCX and LLY has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEXCX vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank
LEXCX
LLY
LEXCX vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEXCX | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 1.97 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 4.93 | +2.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEXCX vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEXCX drawdown since its inception was -50.42%, smaller than the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEXCX and LLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEXCX | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.42% | -68.24% | +17.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.22% | -23.18% | +16.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -34.48% | +20.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.75% | -34.48% | +14.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.21% | -34.48% | -4.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -5.07% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -19.20% | +12.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 9.26% | -6.78% |
Volatility
LEXCX vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) is 4.73%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that LEXCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEXCX | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 8.76% | -4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.93% | 26.89% | -15.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.06% | 37.90% | -23.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 32.46% | -15.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 30.20% | -11.19% |
Dividends
LEXCX vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison
LEXCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than LLY's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEXCX Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.66% | 1.58% | 1.65% | 1.54% | 1.91% | 1.86% | 2.03% | 1.79% | 3.93% | 2.37% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.59% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEXCX and LLY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LLY has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to LEXCX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEXCX dropped -50.42% vs LLY's -68.24%.
LEXCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEXCX and LLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer