HUC.TO vs. ROBO
HUC.TO (Global X Crude Oil ETF) and ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUC.TO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Solactive Light Sweet Crude Oil Winter MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while ROBO is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HUC.TO returned 6.81%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for ROBO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HUC.TO charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ROBO.
Performance
HUC.TO vs. ROBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HUC.TO is traded in CAD, while ROBO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ROBO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HUC.TO having a 22.63% return and ROBO slightly higher at 23.28%. Over the past 10 years, HUC.TO has underperformed ROBO with an annualized return of 6.81%, while ROBO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.23% annualized return.
HUC.TO
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- -10.85%
- YTD
- 22.63%
- 6M
- 20.63%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- 7.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
ROBO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 23.28%
- 6M
- 22.85%
- 1Y
- 47.93%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- 14.23%
HUC.TO vs. ROBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUC.TO Global X Crude Oil ETF | 22.63% | -13.63% | 7.23% | -2.89% | 26.25% | 57.81% | -21.10% | 19.75% | -11.68% | -3.47% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 23.28% | 18.07% | 7.08% | 20.80% | -29.73% | 15.29% | 41.81% | 24.17% | -14.27% | 34.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUC.TO and ROBO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013 | 0.18 |
The correlation between HUC.TO and ROBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUC.TO vs. ROBO — Risk / Return Rank
HUC.TO
ROBO
HUC.TO vs. ROBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Crude Oil ETF (HUC.TO) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUC.TO | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.32 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 2.98 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 10.81 | -8.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUC.TO vs. ROBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUC.TO drawdown since its inception was -88.50%, which is greater than ROBO's maximum drawdown of -38.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUC.TO and ROBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUC.TO | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.50% | -38.47% | -50.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.79% | -16.15% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.83% | -28.62% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -38.47% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.56% | -38.47% | -23.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.48% | -6.40% | -52.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.73% | -9.52% | -43.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 4.45% | +2.37% |
Volatility
HUC.TO vs. ROBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Crude Oil ETF (HUC.TO) is 8.04%, while ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) has a volatility of 11.70%. This indicates that HUC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUC.TO | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 11.70% | -3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.20% | 20.86% | +1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.35% | 25.22% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.05% | 24.58% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.02% | 24.00% | +5.02% |
HUC.TO vs. ROBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUC.TO has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUC.TO vs. ROBO - Dividend Comparison
HUC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUC.TO Global X Crude Oil ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUC.TO and ROBO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROBO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROBO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for HUC.TO.
HUC.TO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while ROBO is Robotics. HUC.TO tracks Solactive Light Sweet Crude Oil Winter MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for HUC.TO and 0.95% for ROBO.
Find the right allocation for HUC.TO and ROBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer