HTZ vs. PL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HTZ (Hertz Global Holdings Inc) and PL (Planet Labs PBC) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — HTZ in Rental & Leasing Services, PL in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 3 years, HTZ returned -31.45%/yr vs 109.66%/yr for PL. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HTZ vs. PL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hertz Global Holdings Inc (HTZ) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTZ achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than PL's 118.71% return.

HTZ

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -11.19%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: -1.15%
• 1Y: -16.50%
• 3Y*: -31.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PL

• 1D: -10.31%
• 1M: 11.91%
• YTD: 118.71%
• 6M: 259.12%
• 1Y: 1,023.18%
• 3Y*: 109.66%
• 5Y*: 34.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTZ vs. PL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HTZ Hertz Global Holdings Inc	0.39%	40.44%	-64.77%	-32.49%	-38.42%	-7.41%
PL Planet Labs PBC	118.71%	388.12%	63.56%	-43.22%	-29.27%	-37.37%

Correlation

The correlation between HTZ and PL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.33

The correlation between HTZ and PL shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap HTZ : $1.62B PL : $13.69B
EPS HTZ : -$1.95 PL : -$0.80
PS Ratio HTZ : 0.19 PL : 43.48
Total Revenue (TTM) HTZ : $8.70B PL : $307.73M
Gross Profit (TTM) HTZ : $1.18B PL : $172.49M
EBITDA (TTM) HTZ : $1.86B PL : -$102.50M

Return for Risk

HTZ vs. PL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTZ

HTZ Risk / Return Rank: 32
HTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
HTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
HTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
HTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
HTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 31

PL

PL Risk / Return Rank: 99
PL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
PL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTZ vs. PL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hertz Global Holdings Inc (HTZ) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTZ	PL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	9.45	-9.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.23	6.39	-6.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.79	-0.76
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	35.64	-35.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	88.66	-89.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HTZ vs. PL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the PL Sharpe Ratio of 9.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTZ and PL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTZ	PL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	9.45	-9.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	0.42	-0.79

Drawdowns

HTZ vs. PL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.38%, which is greater than PL's maximum drawdown of -85.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTZ and PL.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTZ	PL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.38%	-85.73%	-6.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.19%	-29.01%	-22.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-86.27%	-65.51%	-20.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-85.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.00%	-16.09%	-68.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.87%	-50.02%	-14.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.07%	11.64%	+18.43%

Volatility

HTZ vs. PL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hertz Global Holdings Inc (HTZ) is 18.42%, while Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a volatility of 27.87%. This indicates that HTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTZ	PL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.42%	27.87%	-9.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.45%	71.02%	-20.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.03%	109.37%	-31.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.46%	79.87%	-1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.46%	79.03%	-0.57%

Dividends

HTZ vs. PL - Dividend Comparison

Neither HTZ nor PL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTZ and PL in my portfolio?

HTZ and PL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HTZ or PL?

PL has higher volatility (27.87%) compared to HTZ (18.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTZ dropped -92.38% vs PL's -85.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.45 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.