PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTZ vs. AZN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HTZ vs. AZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hertz Global Holdings Inc (HTZ) and AstraZeneca PLC (AZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTZ achieves a -69.16% return, which is significantly lower than AZN's -5.80% return.


HTZ

1D
-4.23%
1M
-25.24%
6M
-67.65%
YTD
-69.16%
1Y
-73.54%
3Y*
-54.17%
5Y*
-38.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-40.41%

AZN

1D
-0.99%
1M
-13.07%
6M
-6.66%
YTD
-5.80%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
8.37%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
12.78%
ALL TIME*
12.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$431.89M$497.68M$403.88M
$31.34M$37.41M$48.89M

HTZ vs. AZN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings Inc
-69.16%40.44%-64.77%-32.49%-38.42%13.59%
AZN
AstraZeneca PLC
-5.80%43.30%-0.62%1.44%19.14%-1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between HTZ and AZN is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HTZ:

$500.44M

AZN:

$131.47B

EPS

HTZ:

-$1.91

AZN:

$13.34

PS Ratio

HTZ:

0.06

AZN:

2.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

HTZ:

$8.70B

AZN:

$61.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HTZ:

$1.18B

AZN:

$48.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

HTZ:

$1.86B

AZN:

$20.49B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTZ vs. AZN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HTZ
HTZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
HTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

AZN
AZN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZN Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZN Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HTZ vs. AZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hertz Global Holdings Inc (HTZ) and AstraZeneca PLC (AZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HTZAZNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.15

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

0.92

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.21

2.43

-4.64

HTZ vs. AZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the AZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTZ and AZN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTZ vs. AZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTZ drawdown since its inception was -95.39%, which is greater than AZN's maximum drawdown of -48.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTZ and AZN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTZAZNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.39%

-48.94%

-46.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.71%

-21.08%

-58.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.12%

-27.87%

-63.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.39%

-27.87%

-67.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.39%

-18.62%

-76.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.65%

-11.39%

-54.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.21%

7.99%

+26.22%

Volatility

HTZ vs. AZN - Volatility Comparison

Hertz Global Holdings Inc (HTZ) has a higher volatility of 26.81% compared to AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) at 11.83%. This indicates that HTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTZAZNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.81%

11.83%

+14.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.84%

19.94%

+56.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

89.75%

27.24%

+62.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.34%

24.51%

+55.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.27%

24.96%

+56.31%

Dividends

HTZ vs. AZN - Dividend Comparison

HTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZN
AstraZeneca PLC
3.14%1.70%2.27%2.15%2.12%2.35%2.80%2.81%3.69%3.95%5.01%4.06%
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HTZ vs. AZN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hertz Global Holdings Inc and AstraZeneca PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

HTZ vs. AZN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hertz Global Holdings Inc and AstraZeneca PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

HTZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hertz Global Holdings Inc reported a gross profit of 179.00M and revenue of 2.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.9%.

AZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AstraZeneca PLC reported a gross profit of 11.18B and revenue of 15.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.6%.

HTZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hertz Global Holdings Inc reported an operating income of -57.00M and revenue of 2.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.

AZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AstraZeneca PLC reported an operating income of 3.07B and revenue of 15.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

HTZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hertz Global Holdings Inc reported a net income of -333.00M and revenue of 2.00B, resulting in a net margin of -16.6%.

AZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AstraZeneca PLC reported a net income of 2.48B and revenue of 15.19B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HTZ and AZN have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTZ has higher volatility (26.81%) compared to AZN (11.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTZ dropped -95.39% vs AZN's -48.94%.

AZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTZ and AZN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer