HTZ vs. VOO
HTZ (Hertz Global Holdings Inc) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 3 years, HTZ returned -33.46%/yr vs 21.36%/yr for VOO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HTZ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HTZ
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 6M
- -10.45%
- 1Y
- -16.42%
- 3Y*
- -33.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
HTZ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTZ Hertz Global Holdings Inc | -0.00% | 40.44% | -64.77% | -32.49% | -38.42% | 13.59% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 11.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTZ and VOO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTZ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
HTZ
VOO
HTZ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hertz Global Holdings Inc (HTZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTZ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.39 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 3.02 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.53 | 13.58 | -14.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTZ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.38%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTZ and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTZ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.38% | -33.99% | -58.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.19% | -8.90% | -42.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.27% | -18.69% | -67.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.05% | -1.74% | -83.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.01% | -3.68% | -61.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.08% | 1.98% | +29.10% |
Volatility
HTZ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Hertz Global Holdings Inc (HTZ) has a higher volatility of 13.63% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that HTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTZ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.63% | 4.60% | +9.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.57% | 9.73% | +40.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.12% | 12.39% | +65.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.84% | 16.90% | +61.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.84% | 18.05% | +60.79% |
Dividends
HTZ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
HTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTZ Hertz Global Holdings Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTZ and VOO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTZ has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTZ dropped -92.38% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTZ and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer