AZN vs. CAH
AZN (AstraZeneca PLC) and CAH (Cardinal Health, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — AZN in Drug Manufacturers - General, CAH in Medical Distribution. Over the past 10 years, AZN returned 13.01%/yr vs 13.79%/yr for CAH. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AZN vs. CAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZN achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than CAH's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, AZN has underperformed CAH with an annualized return of 13.01%, while CAH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.79% annualized return.
AZN
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -9.64%
- 6M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -4.86%
- 1Y
- 14.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.67%
CAH
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- 6M
- 7.99%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 45.30%
- 3Y*
- 37.51%
- 5Y*
- 33.65%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $437.01M | $502.71M | $405.86M | |
| $436.04M | $522.82M | $516.64M |
AZN vs. CAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZN AstraZeneca PLC | -4.86% | 43.30% | -0.62% | 1.44% | 19.14% | 19.66% | 3.12% | 35.68% | 13.86% | 33.10% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 11.28% | 76.25% | 19.01% | 34.15% | 54.08% | -0.40% | 10.09% | 18.04% | -24.50% | -12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZN and CAH is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 1993 | 0.26 |
The correlation between AZN and CAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AZN:
$132.79B
CAH:
$53.18B
AZN:
$13.34
CAH:
$6.57
AZN:
12.84
CAH:
34.57
AZN:
0.02
CAH:
0.82
AZN:
2.19
CAH:
0.22
AZN:
$61.18B
CAH:
$250.55B
AZN:
$48.56B
CAH:
$9.23B
AZN:
$20.49B
CAH:
$2.79B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZN vs. CAH — Risk / Return Rank
AZN
CAH
AZN vs. CAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AZN | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.31 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 2.23 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 6.78 | -4.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AZN vs. CAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZN drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, smaller than the maximum CAH drawdown of -61.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZN and CAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZN | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.94% | -61.93% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.08% | -20.42% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.87% | -20.42% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.87% | -22.34% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.87% | -46.13% | +18.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.80% | -5.27% | -12.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.38% | -15.89% | +4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.91% | 6.70% | +1.21% |
Volatility
AZN vs. CAH - Volatility Comparison
AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) has a higher volatility of 12.13% compared to Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) at 6.32%. This indicates that AZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZN | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.13% | 6.32% | +5.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.07% | 20.76% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.44% | 30.46% | -3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.51% | 25.34% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.95% | 29.27% | -4.32% |
Dividends
AZN vs. CAH - Dividend Comparison
AZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than CAH's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 3.11% | 1.70% | 2.27% | 2.15% | 2.12% | 2.35% | 2.80% | 2.81% | 3.69% | 3.95% | 5.01% | 4.06% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 0.90% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.80% | 4.24% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 1.68% |
Financials
AZN vs. CAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AstraZeneca PLC and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AZN vs. CAH - Profitability Comparison
AZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AstraZeneca PLC reported a gross profit of 11.18B and revenue of 15.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.6%.
CAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.50B and revenue of 60.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.1%.
AZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AstraZeneca PLC reported an operating income of 3.07B and revenue of 15.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
CAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 509.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
AZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AstraZeneca PLC reported a net income of 2.48B and revenue of 15.19B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.
CAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a net income of 399.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AZN and CAH have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AZN has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to CAH (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZN dropped -48.94% vs CAH's -61.93%.
CAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AZN and CAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer