AZN vs. CAH
Compare and contrast key facts about AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AZN or CAH.
Correlation
The correlation between AZN and CAH is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AZN vs. CAH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AZN:
-0.16
CAH:
0.93
AZN:
-0.08
CAH:
1.39
AZN:
0.99
CAH:
1.18
AZN:
-0.12
CAH:
1.11
AZN:
-0.28
CAH:
2.38
AZN:
12.02%
CAH:
8.45%
AZN:
20.79%
CAH:
21.61%
AZN:
-48.94%
CAH:
-61.58%
AZN:
-25.04%
CAH:
-0.07%
Fundamentals
AZN:
$204.77B
CAH:
$30.02B
AZN:
$2.07
CAH:
$5.20
AZN:
31.58
CAH:
23.85
AZN:
0.71
CAH:
1.00
AZN:
$39.18B
CAH:
$167.06B
AZN:
$31.70B
CAH:
$5.59B
AZN:
$12.79B
CAH:
$1.90B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZN achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than CAH's 5.90% return. Over the past 10 years, AZN has outperformed CAH with an annualized return of 9.71%, while CAH has yielded a comparatively lower 7.33% annualized return.
AZN
0.24%
-0.83%
-17.15%
-0.25%
7.66%
9.71%
CAH
5.90%
7.46%
31.11%
19.42%
21.88%
7.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AZN vs. CAH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AZN
CAH
AZN vs. CAH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AZN vs. CAH - Dividend Comparison
AZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than CAH's 1.62% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 2.26% | 2.27% | 2.15% | 2.14% | 2.40% | 2.80% | 2.81% | 3.61% | 3.95% | 5.01% | 4.06% | 3.98% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 1.62% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.79% | 4.24% | 2.99% | 2.41% | 1.68% | 1.65% |
Drawdowns
AZN vs. CAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZN drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, smaller than the maximum CAH drawdown of -61.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZN and CAH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AZN vs. CAH - Volatility Comparison
AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) at 4.13%. This indicates that AZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AZN vs. CAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AstraZeneca PLC and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities