PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTUS vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTUS vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -36.68% return.


HTUS

1D
0.32%
1M
1.37%
6M
10.68%
YTD
11.27%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
20.19%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
12.44%

SMST

1D
-12.10%
1M
26.91%
6M
-13.52%
YTD
-36.68%
1Y
223.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTUS vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
11.27%16.57%4.53%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-36.68%-44.36%-91.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HTUS and SMST is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTUS vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTUS vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HTUSSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.63

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.60

5.07

+7.53

HTUS vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTUS and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTUS vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTUSSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.50%

-99.25%

+51.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-85.39%

+76.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-97.51%

+96.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-90.91%

+86.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

44.25%

-42.46%

Volatility

HTUS vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is 3.19%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 57.45%. This indicates that HTUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTUSSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

57.45%

-54.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

136.03%

-125.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

149.51%

-137.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.10%

167.79%

-148.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.50%

167.79%

-146.29%

HTUS vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTUS vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.69%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
10.69%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HTUS and SMST have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (57.45%) compared to HTUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTUS dropped -47.50% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 223.39% vs 22.51% for HTUS. On fees, HTUS is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 223.39% return vs 22.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HTUS is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.69%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

HTUS is categorized as Long-Short, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HTUS and 1.29% for SMST.

HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTUS and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer