HTUS vs. CSM
Compare and contrast key facts about Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM).
HTUS and CSM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HTUS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Jun 25, 2015. CSM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse 130/30 Large-Cap Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2009.
Performance
HTUS vs. CSM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HTUS vs. CSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | -3.85% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 20.27% | -10.04% | 14.19% |
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | -5.83% | 21.84% | 22.09% | 23.50% | -18.27% | 33.13% | 10.94% | 29.26% | -7.88% | 22.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly higher than CSM's -5.83% return. Over the past 10 years, HTUS has underperformed CSM with an annualized return of 10.99%, while CSM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.84% annualized return.
HTUS
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- -3.85%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 17.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
CSM
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- -5.83%
- 6M
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- 18.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HTUS vs. CSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CSM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HTUS vs. CSM — Risk / Return Rank
HTUS
CSM
HTUS vs. CSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTUS | CSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.99 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.53 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.49 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 6.81 | -0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTUS | CSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.99 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.67 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.70 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.81 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between HTUS and CSM is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HTUS vs. CSM - Dividend Comparison
HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.37%, more than CSM's 1.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 12.37% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% | 0.00% |
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | 1.16% | 1.04% | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 0.78% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.54% | 1.28% | 1.49% | 1.67% |
Drawdowns
HTUS vs. CSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, which is greater than CSM's maximum drawdown of -36.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and CSM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTUS | CSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -36.11% | -11.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.90% | -12.92% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.41% | -23.82% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | -36.11% | -11.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -7.17% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -4.07% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.82% | -0.21% |
Volatility
HTUS vs. CSM - Volatility Comparison
Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) at 4.79%. This indicates that HTUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HTUS | CSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 4.79% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | 9.49% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.90% | 18.97% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 17.12% | +1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 18.37% | +3.01% |