PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTUS vs. BITQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HTUS vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HTUS vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
-3.85%16.57%25.02%30.11%-13.00%15.93%
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
-5.37%18.00%46.97%246.83%-83.86%-7.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly higher than BITQ's -5.37% return.


HTUS

1D
3.72%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
0.02%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
10.99%

BITQ

1D
5.90%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-5.37%
6M
-24.77%
1Y
55.35%
3Y*
48.69%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HTUS vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BITQ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HTUS vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BITQ
BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTUS vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTUSBITQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.94

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

1.59

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.14

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.79

2.59

+4.20

HTUS vs. BITQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the BITQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTUS and BITQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTUSBITQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.94

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

-0.05

+0.56

Correlation

The correlation between HTUS and BITQ is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HTUS vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison

HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.37%, while BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
12.37%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.90%1.51%0.00%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HTUS vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, smaller than the maximum BITQ drawdown of -90.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and BITQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HTUSBITQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.50%

-90.32%

+42.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.90%

-44.99%

+27.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-41.83%

+36.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-53.87%

+49.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

19.73%

-17.12%

Volatility

HTUS vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is 6.36%, while Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a volatility of 17.97%. This indicates that HTUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HTUSBITQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

17.97%

-11.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

45.99%

-36.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

59.04%

-37.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.99%

67.79%

-48.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

67.79%

-46.41%