HTUS vs. BITQ
HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) and BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while BITQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return. HTUS is actively managed, while BITQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HTUS returned 15.60%/yr vs 5.67%/yr for BITQ. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTUS charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BITQ.
Performance
HTUS vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly lower than BITQ's 42.95% return.
HTUS
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 30.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 15.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
BITQ
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- 42.95%
- 6M
- 29.09%
- 1Y
- 70.80%
- 3Y*
- 59.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 11.94% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 15.93% |
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 42.95% | 18.00% | 46.97% | 246.83% | -83.86% | -7.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTUS and BITQ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021 | 0.49 |
The correlation between HTUS and BITQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
HTUS vs. BITQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HTUS
BITQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
HTUS
BITQ
Financial Services
HTUS
BITQ
Communication Services
HTUS
BITQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
HTUS
BITQ
Healthcare
HTUS
BITQ
-
Industrials
HTUS
BITQ
-
Consumer Defensive
HTUS
BITQ
-
Energy
HTUS
BITQ
-
Utilities
HTUS
BITQ
-
Real Estate
HTUS
BITQ
-
Basic Materials
HTUS
BITQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTUS vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank
HTUS
BITQ
HTUS vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTUS | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 1.27 | +1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.85 | 1.86 | +1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.22 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 1.72 | +1.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.06 | 3.62 | +14.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTUS | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 1.27 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.08 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.08 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
HTUS vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, smaller than the maximum BITQ drawdown of -90.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and BITQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTUS | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -90.32% | +42.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -44.99% | +36.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.41% | -51.22% | +26.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.41% | -90.32% | +65.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.12% | +12.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -52.83% | +48.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 21.31% | -19.63% |
Volatility
HTUS vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is 2.42%, while Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a volatility of 14.70%. This indicates that HTUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTUS | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 14.70% | -12.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 42.75% | -33.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 56.10% | -44.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 67.17% | -48.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 67.25% | -45.80% |
HTUS vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BITQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTUS vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison
HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, while BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.62% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTUS and BITQ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITQ has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to HTUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTUS dropped -47.50% vs BITQ's -90.32%.
On 5-year performance, HTUS leads with 15.60% vs 5.67% for BITQ. On fees, BITQ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 15.60% return vs 5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITQ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.62%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.
HTUS is categorized as Long-Short, while BITQ is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HTUS and 0.85% for BITQ.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTUS and BITQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer