PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTO vs. VFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HTO vs. VFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in H2O America (HTO) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTO achieves a 18.36% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, HTO has outperformed VFC with an annualized return of 6.53%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively lower -8.62% annualized return.


HTO

1D
0.74%
1M
3.29%
YTD
18.36%
6M
18.21%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
-4.86%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
6.53%

VFC

1D
0.86%
1M
6.32%
YTD
-1.40%
6M
-9.32%
1Y
55.50%
3Y*
-0.07%
5Y*
-24.00%
10Y*
-8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTO vs. VFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HTO
H2O America
18.36%2.92%-22.57%-17.78%13.40%7.66%-0.43%30.19%-11.20%16.22%
VFC
V.F. Corporation
-1.40%-13.83%16.64%-28.51%-60.38%-12.05%-12.00%51.70%-1.33%42.78%

Correlation

The correlation between HTO and VFC is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985

0.19

Fundamentals

EPS

HTO:

$2.90

VFC:

$0.57

PE Ratio

HTO:

19.70

VFC:

31.09

PEG Ratio

HTO:

2.04

VFC:

0.58

PS Ratio

HTO:

2.54

VFC:

0.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

HTO:

$816.28M

VFC:

$9.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HTO:

$335.79M

VFC:

$5.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

HTO:

$273.35M

VFC:

$961.05M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTO vs. VFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTO
HTO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
HTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VFC
VFC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTO vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H2O America (HTO) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HTOVFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.18

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

1.68

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.48

3.83

-2.34

HTO vs. VFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTO Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the VFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTO and VFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTO vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTO drawdown since its inception was -54.53%, smaller than the maximum VFC drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTO and VFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTOVFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.53%

-88.41%

+33.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.19%

-25.57%

+9.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.14%

-63.66%

+28.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.85%

-86.78%

+43.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.85%

-88.41%

+45.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.64%

-78.40%

+53.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-21.66%

+5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.98%

11.24%

-4.26%

Volatility

HTO vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for H2O America (HTO) is 6.85%, while V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a volatility of 12.43%. This indicates that HTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTOVFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.85%

12.43%

-5.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.54%

30.56%

-14.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.12%

49.25%

-26.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.06%

53.54%

-29.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.56%

44.94%

-15.38%

Dividends

HTO vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison

HTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than VFC's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTO
H2O America
3.01%3.43%3.25%2.33%1.77%1.86%1.85%1.69%2.01%1.63%1.45%2.63%
VFC
V.F. Corporation
2.04%1.99%1.68%5.27%7.28%2.69%2.26%1.91%2.65%2.32%2.87%2.14%

Financials

HTO vs. VFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H2O America and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
183.29M
2.88B
(HTO) Total Revenue
(VFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HTO vs. VFC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between H2O America and V.F. Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
55.6%
Portfolio components
HTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H2O America reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 183.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

VFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.

HTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H2O America reported an operating income of 37.43M and revenue of 183.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

VFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported an operating income of 289.05M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

HTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H2O America reported a net income of 19.01M and revenue of 183.29M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.

VFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a net income of 300.85M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HTO and VFC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFC has higher volatility (12.43%) compared to HTO (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTO dropped -54.53% vs VFC's -88.41%.

VFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTO and VFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer