HTO vs. NFG
HTO (H2O America) and NFG (National Fuel Gas Company) are both stocks. HTO operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities), while NFG operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, HTO returned 7.30%/yr vs 6.69%/yr for NFG. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HTO vs. NFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTO achieves a 17.30% return, which is significantly higher than NFG's -2.89% return. Over the past 10 years, HTO has outperformed NFG with an annualized return of 7.30%, while NFG has yielded a comparatively lower 6.69% annualized return.
HTO
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- 17.30%
- 6M
- 20.93%
- 1Y
- 13.11%
- 3Y*
- -6.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
NFG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- -2.89%
- 6M
- -4.80%
- 1Y
- -3.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
HTO vs. NFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTO H2O America | 17.30% | 2.92% | -22.57% | -17.78% | 13.40% | 7.66% | -0.43% | 30.19% | -11.20% | 16.22% |
NFG National Fuel Gas Company | -2.89% | 35.31% | 25.38% | -17.71% | 1.87% | 60.66% | -7.58% | -5.94% | -3.74% | -0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTO and NFG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 1987 | 0.26 |
The correlation between HTO and NFG shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HTO:
$2.18B
NFG:
$7.25B
HTO:
$2.90
NFG:
$7.46
HTO:
19.52
NFG:
10.36
HTO:
2.02
NFG:
0.08
HTO:
2.51
NFG:
7.20
HTO:
1.19
NFG:
1.90
HTO:
$816.28M
NFG:
$988.24M
HTO:
$335.79M
NFG:
$576.67M
HTO:
$273.35M
NFG:
$1.41B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTO vs. NFG — Risk / Return Rank
HTO
NFG
HTO vs. NFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H2O America (HTO) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTO | NFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.99 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | -0.16 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | -0.35 | +2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTO | NFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | -0.16 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.50 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.28 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
HTO vs. NFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTO drawdown since its inception was -54.53%, roughly equal to the maximum NFG drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTO and NFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTO | NFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.53% | -55.49% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.72% | -20.36% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.86% | -20.36% | -17.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.85% | -35.74% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.85% | -44.28% | +1.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.31% | -19.45% | -5.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -14.30% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.30% | 9.18% | -1.88% |
Volatility
HTO vs. NFG - Volatility Comparison
H2O America (HTO) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) have volatilities of 5.74% and 5.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTO | NFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 5.80% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | 14.18% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.25% | 19.90% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 22.24% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.55% | 24.04% | +5.51% |
Dividends
HTO vs. NFG - Dividend Comparison
HTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than NFG's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTO H2O America | 3.04% | 3.43% | 3.25% | 2.33% | 1.77% | 1.86% | 1.85% | 1.69% | 2.01% | 1.63% | 1.45% | 2.63% |
NFG National Fuel Gas Company | 2.77% | 2.65% | 3.36% | 3.91% | 2.97% | 2.83% | 4.30% | 3.72% | 3.30% | 3.00% | 2.84% | 3.67% |
Financials
HTO vs. NFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H2O America and National Fuel Gas Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HTO vs. NFG - Profitability Comparison
HTO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H2O America reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 183.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a gross profit of -300.89M and revenue of -651.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.2%.
HTO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H2O America reported an operating income of 37.43M and revenue of 183.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.
NFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported an operating income of 347.14M and revenue of -651.51M, resulting in an operating margin of -53.3%.
HTO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H2O America reported a net income of 19.01M and revenue of 183.29M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
NFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a net income of 247.67M and revenue of -651.51M, resulting in a net margin of -38.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HTO and NFG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFG has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to HTO (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTO dropped -54.53% vs NFG's -55.49%.
HTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTO and NFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer